法医获取存储的功能分类及其法律意义

Andreas Hammer, Mathis Ohlig, J. Geus, F. Freiling
{"title":"法医获取存储的功能分类及其法律意义","authors":"Andreas Hammer, Mathis Ohlig, J. Geus, F. Freiling","doi":"10.1145/3609231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to their ease of use and their reliability, managed storage services in the cloud have become a standard way to store files for many users. Consequently, data from cloud storage services and remote file systems in general is an increasingly valuable source of digital evidence in forensic investigations. In this respect, two questions appear relevant: (1) What effect does data acquisition by the client have on the data stored on the server? (2) Does the technology support delayed verification of data acquisition? The two questions refer to critical aspects of forensic evidence collection, namely, in what way does evidence collection interfere with the evidence, and how easy is it to prove the provenance of data in a forensic investigation. We formalize the above questions and use this formalization to classify common storage services. We argue that this classification has direct consequences with regard to the probative value of data acquired from them. We, therefore, discuss the legal implications of this classification with regard to probative value so that IT expert witnesses can adapt their procedures during evidence acquisition and legal practitioners know how to assess such procedures and the evidence obtained through them from cloud storage services.","PeriodicalId":202552,"journal":{"name":"Digital Threats: Research and Practice","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Functional Classification of Forensic Access to Storage and its Legal Implications\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Hammer, Mathis Ohlig, J. Geus, F. Freiling\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3609231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to their ease of use and their reliability, managed storage services in the cloud have become a standard way to store files for many users. Consequently, data from cloud storage services and remote file systems in general is an increasingly valuable source of digital evidence in forensic investigations. In this respect, two questions appear relevant: (1) What effect does data acquisition by the client have on the data stored on the server? (2) Does the technology support delayed verification of data acquisition? The two questions refer to critical aspects of forensic evidence collection, namely, in what way does evidence collection interfere with the evidence, and how easy is it to prove the provenance of data in a forensic investigation. We formalize the above questions and use this formalization to classify common storage services. We argue that this classification has direct consequences with regard to the probative value of data acquired from them. We, therefore, discuss the legal implications of this classification with regard to probative value so that IT expert witnesses can adapt their procedures during evidence acquisition and legal practitioners know how to assess such procedures and the evidence obtained through them from cloud storage services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Threats: Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Threats: Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3609231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Threats: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3609231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于其易用性和可靠性,云中的托管存储服务已成为许多用户存储文件的标准方式。因此,来自云存储服务和远程文件系统的数据通常是法医调查中越来越有价值的数字证据来源。在这方面,两个问题似乎是相关的:(1)客户端的数据采集对存储在服务器上的数据有什么影响?(2)该技术是否支持数据采集的延迟验证?这两个问题涉及法医证据收集的关键方面,即证据收集以何种方式干扰证据,以及在法医调查中证明数据来源的难易程度。我们将上述问题形式化,并使用这种形式化对公共存储服务进行分类。我们认为,这种分类对从他们那里获得的数据的证明价值有直接的影响。因此,我们讨论了这种分类对证据价值的法律影响,以便IT专家证人可以在取证过程中调整他们的程序,法律从业人员知道如何评估这些程序以及通过这些程序从云存储服务中获得的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Functional Classification of Forensic Access to Storage and its Legal Implications
Due to their ease of use and their reliability, managed storage services in the cloud have become a standard way to store files for many users. Consequently, data from cloud storage services and remote file systems in general is an increasingly valuable source of digital evidence in forensic investigations. In this respect, two questions appear relevant: (1) What effect does data acquisition by the client have on the data stored on the server? (2) Does the technology support delayed verification of data acquisition? The two questions refer to critical aspects of forensic evidence collection, namely, in what way does evidence collection interfere with the evidence, and how easy is it to prove the provenance of data in a forensic investigation. We formalize the above questions and use this formalization to classify common storage services. We argue that this classification has direct consequences with regard to the probative value of data acquired from them. We, therefore, discuss the legal implications of this classification with regard to probative value so that IT expert witnesses can adapt their procedures during evidence acquisition and legal practitioners know how to assess such procedures and the evidence obtained through them from cloud storage services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信