技术调查员制度的困惑与纠正

Xuesong Wu, Hongyou Wang
{"title":"技术调查员制度的困惑与纠正","authors":"Xuesong Wu, Hongyou Wang","doi":"10.56397/slj.2023.03.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPOC) issued the Provisions on the Participation of Technical Investigation Officers in Administrative Decisions on Patent and IC Layout Design Infringement Disputes (Provisional) in 2021, which is a further improvement of the refined technical investigation officer system, but the “multiple selective” type of service and the “one-person court appearance” model are obvious drawbacks. The disadvantages of the “multi-selective” mode of service and “one person in court” are obvious, and the mode of service of the technical investigator is worth exploring. Should optimize the number of technical investigators in court and the establishment of “full-time driven by part-time” with the mechanism, change the full confidentiality and objectivity of the technical investigation opinions for moderate disclosure, limiting the participation of expert jurors in the first trial of difficult technical facts, with the conflict of rank rules, refining the new rules to identify the problem of difficult cases of opinion attributes.","PeriodicalId":377631,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Law and Justice","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Confusion and Correction of the Technical Investigator System\",\"authors\":\"Xuesong Wu, Hongyou Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.56397/slj.2023.03.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPOC) issued the Provisions on the Participation of Technical Investigation Officers in Administrative Decisions on Patent and IC Layout Design Infringement Disputes (Provisional) in 2021, which is a further improvement of the refined technical investigation officer system, but the “multiple selective” type of service and the “one-person court appearance” model are obvious drawbacks. The disadvantages of the “multi-selective” mode of service and “one person in court” are obvious, and the mode of service of the technical investigator is worth exploring. Should optimize the number of technical investigators in court and the establishment of “full-time driven by part-time” with the mechanism, change the full confidentiality and objectivity of the technical investigation opinions for moderate disclosure, limiting the participation of expert jurors in the first trial of difficult technical facts, with the conflict of rank rules, refining the new rules to identify the problem of difficult cases of opinion attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Law and Justice\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Law and Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2023.03.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Law and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2023.03.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国国家知识产权局于2021年发布了《技术侦查官参与专利和集成电路布图设计侵权纠纷行政裁决规定(暂行)》,是对精细化的技术侦查官制度的进一步完善,但“多选”式服务和“一人出庭”模式弊端明显。“多选”送达模式和“一人出庭”送达模式弊端明显,技术侦查人员送达模式值得探索。应优化技术调查人员出庭数量和建立“专职驱动兼职”配合机制,将技术调查意见的完全保密和客观性改为适度公开,限制专家陪审员参与初审疑难技术事实,采用等级冲突规则,细化鉴定疑难案件意见属性问题的新规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Confusion and Correction of the Technical Investigator System
State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPOC) issued the Provisions on the Participation of Technical Investigation Officers in Administrative Decisions on Patent and IC Layout Design Infringement Disputes (Provisional) in 2021, which is a further improvement of the refined technical investigation officer system, but the “multiple selective” type of service and the “one-person court appearance” model are obvious drawbacks. The disadvantages of the “multi-selective” mode of service and “one person in court” are obvious, and the mode of service of the technical investigator is worth exploring. Should optimize the number of technical investigators in court and the establishment of “full-time driven by part-time” with the mechanism, change the full confidentiality and objectivity of the technical investigation opinions for moderate disclosure, limiting the participation of expert jurors in the first trial of difficult technical facts, with the conflict of rank rules, refining the new rules to identify the problem of difficult cases of opinion attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信