A. Knudsen, Y. Couturier, Jesse Alan Hardt, Magne Boganes, B. Dow, Kim Eivind Nord-Varhaug
{"title":"挪威海上辅助井控自动化压力控制系统演示","authors":"A. Knudsen, Y. Couturier, Jesse Alan Hardt, Magne Boganes, B. Dow, Kim Eivind Nord-Varhaug","doi":"10.2118/194089-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This case history paper describes the well integrity challenges Spirit Energy was faced with for executing the drilling operations on the Scarecrow wildcat well in the Barents Sea. The expected reservoir depth on Scarecrow was the shallowest reservoir ever drilled in the Barents Sea being only 188 m below mudline with a water depth of 454 m MSL.\n Several mitigating actions were implemented to improve robustness of the well integrity such as:\n The focus in this paper is to describe the qualification of a new automated pressure control method (Autochoke system) used on the Scarecrow wildcat well in the Barents Sea for circulating out an influx. Simulations and return of experience indicated that manual conventional well control practices would not provide sufficient pressure control precision to maintain bottomhole pressure within the +/- 4 bar (58 psi) operational window required to circulate out an influx. A new automated pressure control method based on a commercial managed pressure drilling (MPD) control system was developed, tested, and DNV approved to achieve the required pressure control precision for both single- and multi-phase scenarios, and permit safe operations.\n \n \n \n A pressure control method was developed to automate control of well control chokes to maintain a constant standpipe pressure, as required during circulating using Driller's Method. The methodology used is comparable to commercial MPD pressure control systems, in which pressure transducer (PT) measurements are input to a control loop which actuates chokes to attain the pressure demand while minimizing overshoot. Unlike a typical MPD installation, in which PTs are typically located upstream of a choke manifold, this installation utilized PTs installed on the rig standpipe, with chokes installed in the well control manifold. The choke control system was improved to automatically compute and account for pressure wave propagation lag due to the distance between the chokes and the control PTs.\n \n \n \n The system was tested at a test rig in Norway that permitted the injection of air into the standpipe to simulate a gas kick. In multiple test cases, various quantities of air were injected into the standpipe, circulated into the annulus, and finally circulated out of the wellbore with automated chokes operating to maintain a constant standpipe pressure as the air was circulated out of the wellbore and through the chokes. Testing was repeated with varying quantities of injected air and varying standpipe pressure setpoints to validate the process across a range of operating conditions. The control system demonstrated standpipe pressure control precision of +/- 1 bar (14.5 psi) during all test phases, achieving the required precision. Testing under additional operating conditions was conducted to approximate a real-world well control scenario, in which constant casing pressure is maintained while ramping the pumps, and constant standpipe pressure is maintained while circulating out the kick (i.e. first circulation of driller's method of well control). The maximum observed deviation from the control value was 2 bar (29 psi), again meeting the required control precision.\n \n \n \n These tests were observed, validated, and approved by DNV. The technology was introduced to the field in July 2018.\n","PeriodicalId":441797,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demonstration of Automated Pressure Control System for Assisted Well Control Offshore Norway\",\"authors\":\"A. Knudsen, Y. Couturier, Jesse Alan Hardt, Magne Boganes, B. Dow, Kim Eivind Nord-Varhaug\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/194089-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n This case history paper describes the well integrity challenges Spirit Energy was faced with for executing the drilling operations on the Scarecrow wildcat well in the Barents Sea. The expected reservoir depth on Scarecrow was the shallowest reservoir ever drilled in the Barents Sea being only 188 m below mudline with a water depth of 454 m MSL.\\n Several mitigating actions were implemented to improve robustness of the well integrity such as:\\n The focus in this paper is to describe the qualification of a new automated pressure control method (Autochoke system) used on the Scarecrow wildcat well in the Barents Sea for circulating out an influx. Simulations and return of experience indicated that manual conventional well control practices would not provide sufficient pressure control precision to maintain bottomhole pressure within the +/- 4 bar (58 psi) operational window required to circulate out an influx. A new automated pressure control method based on a commercial managed pressure drilling (MPD) control system was developed, tested, and DNV approved to achieve the required pressure control precision for both single- and multi-phase scenarios, and permit safe operations.\\n \\n \\n \\n A pressure control method was developed to automate control of well control chokes to maintain a constant standpipe pressure, as required during circulating using Driller's Method. The methodology used is comparable to commercial MPD pressure control systems, in which pressure transducer (PT) measurements are input to a control loop which actuates chokes to attain the pressure demand while minimizing overshoot. Unlike a typical MPD installation, in which PTs are typically located upstream of a choke manifold, this installation utilized PTs installed on the rig standpipe, with chokes installed in the well control manifold. The choke control system was improved to automatically compute and account for pressure wave propagation lag due to the distance between the chokes and the control PTs.\\n \\n \\n \\n The system was tested at a test rig in Norway that permitted the injection of air into the standpipe to simulate a gas kick. In multiple test cases, various quantities of air were injected into the standpipe, circulated into the annulus, and finally circulated out of the wellbore with automated chokes operating to maintain a constant standpipe pressure as the air was circulated out of the wellbore and through the chokes. Testing was repeated with varying quantities of injected air and varying standpipe pressure setpoints to validate the process across a range of operating conditions. The control system demonstrated standpipe pressure control precision of +/- 1 bar (14.5 psi) during all test phases, achieving the required precision. Testing under additional operating conditions was conducted to approximate a real-world well control scenario, in which constant casing pressure is maintained while ramping the pumps, and constant standpipe pressure is maintained while circulating out the kick (i.e. first circulation of driller's method of well control). The maximum observed deviation from the control value was 2 bar (29 psi), again meeting the required control precision.\\n \\n \\n \\n These tests were observed, validated, and approved by DNV. The technology was introduced to the field in July 2018.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":441797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/194089-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194089-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇案例历史论文描述了Spirit Energy在巴伦支海的稻草人野猫井钻井作业中所面临的井完整性挑战。稻草人的预期储层深度是巴伦支海有史以来钻探的最浅的储层,仅在泥线以下188米,水深为454米。本文重点介绍了一种新的自动化压力控制方法(Autochoke系统)的性能,该方法应用于巴伦支海的稻草人野猫井,用于循环出注入物。模拟和经验反馈表明,手动常规井控方法无法提供足够的压力控制精度,无法将井底压力保持在+/- 4 bar (58 psi)的作业窗口内,以循环出流入物。一种基于商业控压钻井(MPD)控制系统的新型自动化压力控制方法得到了开发、测试和DNV的认可,该方法可以在单相和多相工况下实现所需的压力控制精度,并保证安全作业。开发了一种压力控制方法,可以自动控制井控扼流圈,以保持固定的立管压力,这是使用司钻法循环时所需要的。所使用的方法与商业MPD压力控制系统相当,在MPD压力控制系统中,压力传感器(PT)的测量值被输入到控制回路,该控制回路驱动扼流圈,以达到压力需求,同时最大限度地减少超调。与典型的MPD安装不同的是,pt通常位于节流管汇的上游,该装置将pt安装在钻机立管上,而节流管汇则安装在井控管汇上。节流器控制系统得到了改进,可以自动计算和计算由于节流器与控制点之间距离造成的压力波传播滞后。该系统在挪威的一个测试平台上进行了测试,允许向立管注入空气来模拟气涌。在多个测试案例中,将不同数量的空气注入立管,循环进入环空,最后通过自动节流器循环出井筒,以保持空气从井筒中循环出并通过节流器时立管压力恒定。在不同的注入空气量和不同的立管压力设定值下重复测试,以验证该过程在一系列操作条件下的有效性。在所有测试阶段,控制系统的立管压力控制精度为+/- 1 bar (14.5 psi),达到了所需的精度。在额外的操作条件下进行了测试,以近似于真实的井控场景,在此场景中,在泵泵的同时保持恒定的套管压力,在井涌循环时保持恒定的立管压力(即司钻的井控方法的第一次循环)。观察到的与控制值的最大偏差为2 bar (29 psi),再次满足所需的控制精度。这些试验由DNV观察、验证和批准。该技术于2018年7月引入该油田。
Demonstration of Automated Pressure Control System for Assisted Well Control Offshore Norway
This case history paper describes the well integrity challenges Spirit Energy was faced with for executing the drilling operations on the Scarecrow wildcat well in the Barents Sea. The expected reservoir depth on Scarecrow was the shallowest reservoir ever drilled in the Barents Sea being only 188 m below mudline with a water depth of 454 m MSL.
Several mitigating actions were implemented to improve robustness of the well integrity such as:
The focus in this paper is to describe the qualification of a new automated pressure control method (Autochoke system) used on the Scarecrow wildcat well in the Barents Sea for circulating out an influx. Simulations and return of experience indicated that manual conventional well control practices would not provide sufficient pressure control precision to maintain bottomhole pressure within the +/- 4 bar (58 psi) operational window required to circulate out an influx. A new automated pressure control method based on a commercial managed pressure drilling (MPD) control system was developed, tested, and DNV approved to achieve the required pressure control precision for both single- and multi-phase scenarios, and permit safe operations.
A pressure control method was developed to automate control of well control chokes to maintain a constant standpipe pressure, as required during circulating using Driller's Method. The methodology used is comparable to commercial MPD pressure control systems, in which pressure transducer (PT) measurements are input to a control loop which actuates chokes to attain the pressure demand while minimizing overshoot. Unlike a typical MPD installation, in which PTs are typically located upstream of a choke manifold, this installation utilized PTs installed on the rig standpipe, with chokes installed in the well control manifold. The choke control system was improved to automatically compute and account for pressure wave propagation lag due to the distance between the chokes and the control PTs.
The system was tested at a test rig in Norway that permitted the injection of air into the standpipe to simulate a gas kick. In multiple test cases, various quantities of air were injected into the standpipe, circulated into the annulus, and finally circulated out of the wellbore with automated chokes operating to maintain a constant standpipe pressure as the air was circulated out of the wellbore and through the chokes. Testing was repeated with varying quantities of injected air and varying standpipe pressure setpoints to validate the process across a range of operating conditions. The control system demonstrated standpipe pressure control precision of +/- 1 bar (14.5 psi) during all test phases, achieving the required precision. Testing under additional operating conditions was conducted to approximate a real-world well control scenario, in which constant casing pressure is maintained while ramping the pumps, and constant standpipe pressure is maintained while circulating out the kick (i.e. first circulation of driller's method of well control). The maximum observed deviation from the control value was 2 bar (29 psi), again meeting the required control precision.
These tests were observed, validated, and approved by DNV. The technology was introduced to the field in July 2018.