面向对象范式适合科学软件吗?

ACM-SE 35 Pub Date : 1997-04-02 DOI:10.1145/2817460.2817487

Nanshan Zeng, S. Schach

{"title":"面向对象范式适合科学软件吗?","authors":"Nanshan Zeng, S. Schach","doi":"10.1145/2817460.2817487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an object-based reengineering case study. Multi-configuration Hartree-Fock legacy software written in FORTRAN 77 was reengineered in FORTRAN 90 using the OMT methodology. The resulting object-based product was unsatisfactory; in particular, the object model had far too many interconnections. In addition, there was conflict between information hiding and efficiency issues. Based on the case study, it was concluded that the object-oriented paradigm may not be applicable to algorithm-intensive scientific software.","PeriodicalId":274966,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 35","volume":"379 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the object-oriented paradigm appropriate for scientific software?\",\"authors\":\"Nanshan Zeng, S. Schach\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2817460.2817487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes an object-based reengineering case study. Multi-configuration Hartree-Fock legacy software written in FORTRAN 77 was reengineered in FORTRAN 90 using the OMT methodology. The resulting object-based product was unsatisfactory; in particular, the object model had far too many interconnections. In addition, there was conflict between information hiding and efficiency issues. Based on the case study, it was concluded that the object-oriented paradigm may not be applicable to algorithm-intensive scientific software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM-SE 35\",\"volume\":\"379 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM-SE 35\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2817460.2817487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 35","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2817460.2817487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文描述了一个基于对象的再造案例研究。使用OMT方法在FORTRAN 90中重新设计了用FORTRAN 77编写的多配置Hartree-Fock遗留软件。最终的基于对象的产品不令人满意;特别是，对象模型有太多的相互连接。此外，还存在信息隐藏与效率问题之间的冲突。通过实例分析，得出了面向对象范式可能不适用于算法密集型科学软件的结论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Is the object-oriented paradigm appropriate for scientific software?

This paper describes an object-based reengineering case study. Multi-configuration Hartree-Fock legacy software written in FORTRAN 77 was reengineered in FORTRAN 90 using the OMT methodology. The resulting object-based product was unsatisfactory; in particular, the object model had far too many interconnections. In addition, there was conflict between information hiding and efficiency issues. Based on the case study, it was concluded that the object-oriented paradigm may not be applicable to algorithm-intensive scientific software.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACM-SE 35

自引率

0.00%

发文量