基于平衡计分卡的教职员与非教职员电子绩效评估比较:个案研究

Z. Tarigan, I. N. Sutapa, Jenny Mochtar
{"title":"基于平衡计分卡的教职员与非教职员电子绩效评估比较:个案研究","authors":"Z. Tarigan, I. N. Sutapa, Jenny Mochtar","doi":"10.1145/3124116.3124132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance appraisal is a tool used by most organizations, including higher education, to appraise the performance of their staffs. Staffs in higher education in Indonesia are roughly divided into two groups, the academic and non-academic, and both groups are usually appraised annually. This study is based on a research of the e-performance appraisal used by Petra Christian University to appraise its academic and non-academic staffs. The performance appraisal used is based on Balanced Score Card (BSC) focusing on four perspectives, learning and growth, internal business process, customer satisfaction and financial performance. Data entries on the performance of the staffs are input on-line by the administrative departments responsible for the data. The data were collected using judgmental sampling and simple random sampling of forty academic and forty non-academic staffs. Using t-test, it is revealed that in the aspects of learning and growth, and financial performance, there is a discrepancy between the academic and non-academic e-performance. In the aspects of customer satisfaction and internal business process, there is no significant discrepancy.","PeriodicalId":292213,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of academic and non-academic staffs' balanced score card based e-performance appraisal: a case study\",\"authors\":\"Z. Tarigan, I. N. Sutapa, Jenny Mochtar\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3124116.3124132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performance appraisal is a tool used by most organizations, including higher education, to appraise the performance of their staffs. Staffs in higher education in Indonesia are roughly divided into two groups, the academic and non-academic, and both groups are usually appraised annually. This study is based on a research of the e-performance appraisal used by Petra Christian University to appraise its academic and non-academic staffs. The performance appraisal used is based on Balanced Score Card (BSC) focusing on four perspectives, learning and growth, internal business process, customer satisfaction and financial performance. Data entries on the performance of the staffs are input on-line by the administrative departments responsible for the data. The data were collected using judgmental sampling and simple random sampling of forty academic and forty non-academic staffs. Using t-test, it is revealed that in the aspects of learning and growth, and financial performance, there is a discrepancy between the academic and non-academic e-performance. In the aspects of customer satisfaction and internal business process, there is no significant discrepancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3124116.3124132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3124116.3124132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

绩效评估是包括高等教育在内的大多数组织用来评估员工绩效的工具。印尼高等教育的工作人员大致分为两类,学术类和非学术类,这两类人员通常每年进行一次评估。本研究基于佩特拉基督教大学对其学术和非学术人员的电子绩效评估的研究。使用的绩效评估基于平衡计分卡(BSC),侧重于学习和成长、内部业务流程、客户满意度和财务绩效四个方面。员工绩效数据由负责数据的行政部门在线输入。采用判断抽样和简单随机抽样的方法对40名学术人员和40名非学术人员进行数据收集。运用t检验发现,在学习与成长、财务绩效方面,学术型与非学术型电子绩效存在差异。在顾客满意度和内部业务流程方面,没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of academic and non-academic staffs' balanced score card based e-performance appraisal: a case study
Performance appraisal is a tool used by most organizations, including higher education, to appraise the performance of their staffs. Staffs in higher education in Indonesia are roughly divided into two groups, the academic and non-academic, and both groups are usually appraised annually. This study is based on a research of the e-performance appraisal used by Petra Christian University to appraise its academic and non-academic staffs. The performance appraisal used is based on Balanced Score Card (BSC) focusing on four perspectives, learning and growth, internal business process, customer satisfaction and financial performance. Data entries on the performance of the staffs are input on-line by the administrative departments responsible for the data. The data were collected using judgmental sampling and simple random sampling of forty academic and forty non-academic staffs. Using t-test, it is revealed that in the aspects of learning and growth, and financial performance, there is a discrepancy between the academic and non-academic e-performance. In the aspects of customer satisfaction and internal business process, there is no significant discrepancy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信