知识产权民事执法:诉讼效率与措施可及性公众咨询。CEIPI关于公众咨询的意见,重点是替代性争议解决机制

C. Geiger, Xavier Seuba, A. Hatanaka
{"title":"知识产权民事执法:诉讼效率与措施可及性公众咨询。CEIPI关于公众咨询的意见,重点是替代性争议解决机制","authors":"C. Geiger, Xavier Seuba, A. Hatanaka","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2971107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a part of a consultation with stakeholders in order to evaluate the overall functioning of the civil enforcement mechanism for intellectual property rights, the European Commission has opened a survey on “the efficiency of proceedings and accessibility of measures” to gather specific information about the enforcement of intellectual property rights through contracts, litigation, or other means. The Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) submits a certain number of observations to the European legislature from the perspective of ADR (alternative dispute resolution). \nAlthough ADR has been recognized as an important means of dispute resolution and much effort - primarily on the national level - has been made, its use in the field of intellectual property rights remains modest. The CEIPI provides an analysis on the current state of affairs and advances proposals on how best the European Commission could make use of ADR in order to achieve effective enforcement of intellectual property rights.","PeriodicalId":432577,"journal":{"name":"Center for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper Series","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civil Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: Public Consultation on the Efficiency of Proceedings and Accessibility of Measures. CEIPI's Comments on the Public Consultation, with a Focus on Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"C. Geiger, Xavier Seuba, A. Hatanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2971107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a part of a consultation with stakeholders in order to evaluate the overall functioning of the civil enforcement mechanism for intellectual property rights, the European Commission has opened a survey on “the efficiency of proceedings and accessibility of measures” to gather specific information about the enforcement of intellectual property rights through contracts, litigation, or other means. The Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) submits a certain number of observations to the European legislature from the perspective of ADR (alternative dispute resolution). \\nAlthough ADR has been recognized as an important means of dispute resolution and much effort - primarily on the national level - has been made, its use in the field of intellectual property rights remains modest. The CEIPI provides an analysis on the current state of affairs and advances proposals on how best the European Commission could make use of ADR in order to achieve effective enforcement of intellectual property rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Center for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Center for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2971107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2971107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了评估知识产权民事执法机制的整体运作,作为与利益相关者磋商的一部分,欧盟委员会(European Commission)开展了一项关于“诉讼效率和措施可及性”的调查,以收集有关通过合同、诉讼或其他方式执行知识产权的具体信息。国际知识产权研究中心(CEIPI)从替代性争端解决机制的角度向欧洲立法机构提出了若干意见。尽管ADR已被公认为解决争端的一种重要手段,而且主要在国家一级作出了许多努力,但它在知识产权领域的应用仍然有限。CEIPI对当前的情况进行了分析,并就欧盟委员会如何最好地利用ADR来实现知识产权的有效执法提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Civil Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: Public Consultation on the Efficiency of Proceedings and Accessibility of Measures. CEIPI's Comments on the Public Consultation, with a Focus on Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
As a part of a consultation with stakeholders in order to evaluate the overall functioning of the civil enforcement mechanism for intellectual property rights, the European Commission has opened a survey on “the efficiency of proceedings and accessibility of measures” to gather specific information about the enforcement of intellectual property rights through contracts, litigation, or other means. The Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) submits a certain number of observations to the European legislature from the perspective of ADR (alternative dispute resolution). Although ADR has been recognized as an important means of dispute resolution and much effort - primarily on the national level - has been made, its use in the field of intellectual property rights remains modest. The CEIPI provides an analysis on the current state of affairs and advances proposals on how best the European Commission could make use of ADR in order to achieve effective enforcement of intellectual property rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信