法官能否确定公平交易程序?

LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic) Pub Date : 1984-03-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2960729

D. Polsby, M. Freed

{"title":"法官能否确定公平交易程序?","authors":"D. Polsby, M. Freed","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2960729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Alan Hyde believes, and we disbelieve, that giving courts the power to review union contracts for fairness will increase the sum of fairness in the world. We assert that there is no procedural routine that is “fair” in the sense of guaranteeing distributional outcomes.","PeriodicalId":373008,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Reply to Hyde, Can Judges Identify Fair Bargaining Procedures?\",\"authors\":\"D. Polsby, M. Freed\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2960729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professor Alan Hyde believes, and we disbelieve, that giving courts the power to review union contracts for fairness will increase the sum of fairness in the world. We assert that there is no procedural routine that is “fair” in the sense of guaranteeing distributional outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2960729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2960729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

艾伦·海德教授相信，而我们不相信，赋予法院审查工会合同公平的权力将增加世界公平的总和。我们断言，在保证分配结果的意义上，没有程序程序是“公平的”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Reply to Hyde, Can Judges Identify Fair Bargaining Procedures?

Professor Alan Hyde believes, and we disbelieve, that giving courts the power to review union contracts for fairness will increase the sum of fairness in the world. We assert that there is no procedural routine that is “fair” in the sense of guaranteeing distributional outcomes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量