U. Majumdar, C. Cuvillier Padilla, A. Attaway, U. Hatipoğlu
{"title":"COPD急性加重期标准化护理路径的实施","authors":"U. Majumdar, C. Cuvillier Padilla, A. Attaway, U. Hatipoğlu","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a4862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) is a major cause of hospitalization and re-admissions. Lack of standardized management and non-adherence to guideline-directed treatment may lead to poor outcomes and increase cost. Interventions implemented by health systems to reduce readmissions have had varied success. Heterogeneity in the target patient population is a significant challenge. The Cleveland Clinic COPD Care Path consists of an admission order set that incorporates multi-disciplinary management, evidence-based medications, and postdischarge integrated care. In this study, we examined impact of this Care Path on quality metrics and 30-day readmissions of patients with proven COPD on spirometry. Methods: We studied patients with spirometry proven persistent airflow obstruction (postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC<70) admitted to the general nursing floor with AECOPD during the 3 years prior to the COVID pandemic (February 2, 2017 to January 31, 2020), excluding those who left against medical advice, hospice and transplant patients. Patient's Care Path status (On vs Off), age, gender, BMI, baseline lung function and comorbidities were recorded. We measured process metrics such as appropriate use of antibiotics and corticosteroids, and post-discharge integrated disease management (rates of prescribing long-acting bronchodilator, follow-up appointments). 30-day readmission rate, length of stay (LOS) observed to expected (O: E) ratio and cost per case were recorded. For continuous variables, we used means and standard deviations and the ANOVA test for statistical analysis. For categorical variables, percentages, and the t- test were used. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Of the total of 857 patients with airflow obstruction, the Care Path was utilized in 52.8% and 21.94% were readmitted within 30 days. Lower re-admissions were associated with lower comorbidity index and completed follow-up appointments. Lung function, long acting bronchodilator prescription and cost or length of index hospitalization did not affect readmission. The care path was utilized more among patients with lower FEV1/FVC ratio but less in patients with concomitant heart failure. Use of the care path was associated with more follow-up appointments (scheduled and completed), long-acting bronchodilator prescription on discharge, lower cost but not length of stay. On-Care-Path patients did not have a reduced risk of readmission on univariate analysis. Conclusions: The findings from this retrospective study of patients with spirometry proven COPD suggest that using standardized care path for AECOPD hospitalizations is associated with lower cost and facilitates transitions of care. However, length of stay and 30-day readmission rates are unaffected. (Figure Presented).","PeriodicalId":429370,"journal":{"name":"C102. USING ANALOG OR TECHNOLOGY TOOLS TO EVALUATE AND INTERVENE TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE DELIVERY","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Standardized Care Path for COPD Exacerbations\",\"authors\":\"U. Majumdar, C. Cuvillier Padilla, A. Attaway, U. Hatipoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a4862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) is a major cause of hospitalization and re-admissions. Lack of standardized management and non-adherence to guideline-directed treatment may lead to poor outcomes and increase cost. Interventions implemented by health systems to reduce readmissions have had varied success. Heterogeneity in the target patient population is a significant challenge. The Cleveland Clinic COPD Care Path consists of an admission order set that incorporates multi-disciplinary management, evidence-based medications, and postdischarge integrated care. In this study, we examined impact of this Care Path on quality metrics and 30-day readmissions of patients with proven COPD on spirometry. Methods: We studied patients with spirometry proven persistent airflow obstruction (postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC<70) admitted to the general nursing floor with AECOPD during the 3 years prior to the COVID pandemic (February 2, 2017 to January 31, 2020), excluding those who left against medical advice, hospice and transplant patients. Patient's Care Path status (On vs Off), age, gender, BMI, baseline lung function and comorbidities were recorded. We measured process metrics such as appropriate use of antibiotics and corticosteroids, and post-discharge integrated disease management (rates of prescribing long-acting bronchodilator, follow-up appointments). 30-day readmission rate, length of stay (LOS) observed to expected (O: E) ratio and cost per case were recorded. For continuous variables, we used means and standard deviations and the ANOVA test for statistical analysis. For categorical variables, percentages, and the t- test were used. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Of the total of 857 patients with airflow obstruction, the Care Path was utilized in 52.8% and 21.94% were readmitted within 30 days. Lower re-admissions were associated with lower comorbidity index and completed follow-up appointments. Lung function, long acting bronchodilator prescription and cost or length of index hospitalization did not affect readmission. The care path was utilized more among patients with lower FEV1/FVC ratio but less in patients with concomitant heart failure. Use of the care path was associated with more follow-up appointments (scheduled and completed), long-acting bronchodilator prescription on discharge, lower cost but not length of stay. On-Care-Path patients did not have a reduced risk of readmission on univariate analysis. Conclusions: The findings from this retrospective study of patients with spirometry proven COPD suggest that using standardized care path for AECOPD hospitalizations is associated with lower cost and facilitates transitions of care. However, length of stay and 30-day readmission rates are unaffected. (Figure Presented).\",\"PeriodicalId\":429370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"C102. USING ANALOG OR TECHNOLOGY TOOLS TO EVALUATE AND INTERVENE TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE DELIVERY\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"C102. USING ANALOG OR TECHNOLOGY TOOLS TO EVALUATE AND INTERVENE TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE DELIVERY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a4862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C102. USING ANALOG OR TECHNOLOGY TOOLS TO EVALUATE AND INTERVENE TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE DELIVERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a4862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)是住院和再入院的主要原因。缺乏标准化的管理和不遵守指导治疗可能导致不良结果和增加成本。卫生系统为减少再入院而实施的干预措施取得了不同程度的成功。目标患者群体的异质性是一个重大挑战。克利夫兰诊所慢性阻塞性肺病护理路径包括一套纳入多学科管理、循证药物治疗和出院后综合护理的入院令。在这项研究中,我们检查了这种护理路径对质量指标的影响,以及经肺活量测定证实的COPD患者30天再入院率。方法:我们研究了在COVID大流行前3年内(2017年2月2日至2020年1月31日)入住普通护理层的AECOPD患者,经肺活量测定证实为持续气流阻塞(支气管扩张剂后FEV1/FVC<70),不包括不听从医嘱离开的患者、临终关怀患者和移植患者。记录患者的Care Path状态(On vs Off)、年龄、性别、BMI、基线肺功能和合并症。我们测量了过程指标,如抗生素和皮质类固醇的适当使用,出院后综合疾病管理(处方长效支气管扩张剂的比例,随访预约)。记录30天再入院率、观察到的住院时间(LOS)与预期的(O: E)比和每例费用。对于连续变量,我们使用均值和标准差,并使用ANOVA检验进行统计分析。对于分类变量,采用百分比和t检验。p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义的水平。结果:857例气流阻塞患者中,52.8%的患者使用了Care Path, 21.94%的患者在30 d内再次入院。较低的再入院率与较低的合并症指数和完成的随访预约有关。肺功能、长效支气管扩张剂处方和指数住院费用或时间对再入院没有影响。FEV1/FVC比值较低的患者多采用该护理路径,而合并心力衰竭患者较少采用该护理路径。使用护理路径与更多的随访预约(安排和完成)、出院时的长效支气管扩张剂处方、较低的费用相关,但与住院时间无关。单因素分析显示,在护理路径上的患者再入院风险没有降低。结论:这项对肺活量测定证实患有COPD的患者的回顾性研究结果表明,在AECOPD住院治疗中使用标准化的护理路径可以降低成本并促进护理的过渡。然而,停留时间和30天的再入院率不受影响。(图)。
Implementation of Standardized Care Path for COPD Exacerbations
Introduction: Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) is a major cause of hospitalization and re-admissions. Lack of standardized management and non-adherence to guideline-directed treatment may lead to poor outcomes and increase cost. Interventions implemented by health systems to reduce readmissions have had varied success. Heterogeneity in the target patient population is a significant challenge. The Cleveland Clinic COPD Care Path consists of an admission order set that incorporates multi-disciplinary management, evidence-based medications, and postdischarge integrated care. In this study, we examined impact of this Care Path on quality metrics and 30-day readmissions of patients with proven COPD on spirometry. Methods: We studied patients with spirometry proven persistent airflow obstruction (postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC<70) admitted to the general nursing floor with AECOPD during the 3 years prior to the COVID pandemic (February 2, 2017 to January 31, 2020), excluding those who left against medical advice, hospice and transplant patients. Patient's Care Path status (On vs Off), age, gender, BMI, baseline lung function and comorbidities were recorded. We measured process metrics such as appropriate use of antibiotics and corticosteroids, and post-discharge integrated disease management (rates of prescribing long-acting bronchodilator, follow-up appointments). 30-day readmission rate, length of stay (LOS) observed to expected (O: E) ratio and cost per case were recorded. For continuous variables, we used means and standard deviations and the ANOVA test for statistical analysis. For categorical variables, percentages, and the t- test were used. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Of the total of 857 patients with airflow obstruction, the Care Path was utilized in 52.8% and 21.94% were readmitted within 30 days. Lower re-admissions were associated with lower comorbidity index and completed follow-up appointments. Lung function, long acting bronchodilator prescription and cost or length of index hospitalization did not affect readmission. The care path was utilized more among patients with lower FEV1/FVC ratio but less in patients with concomitant heart failure. Use of the care path was associated with more follow-up appointments (scheduled and completed), long-acting bronchodilator prescription on discharge, lower cost but not length of stay. On-Care-Path patients did not have a reduced risk of readmission on univariate analysis. Conclusions: The findings from this retrospective study of patients with spirometry proven COPD suggest that using standardized care path for AECOPD hospitalizations is associated with lower cost and facilitates transitions of care. However, length of stay and 30-day readmission rates are unaffected. (Figure Presented).