种植体成角对上颌后缘骨丢失的影响

I. Metwally, A. Elfeky, A. Hosny
{"title":"种植体成角对上颌后缘骨丢失的影响","authors":"I. Metwally, A. Elfeky, A. Hosny","doi":"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the marginal bone loss in the angled implant in the posterior maxillary region. Subjects and methods: A total of 14 implants, 7 angled implants and 7 straight implants in posterior maxilla with surgical guide were placed. Seven patients ranged in age between 40.0 – 43.0 years with a mean age of 41.71 ± 1.25 years for angulated implant group; and seven patients ranged in age between 44.0 – 45.0 years with a mean age 44.43 ± 0.53 years for straight implant group. Flap less approach through surgical guide with angulation 25-30 for angled implant and straight implant without angulation. Results: Angulated implant showed a higher significant buccal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Angulated implant showed a higher significant palatal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Conclusion : The angled implant showed a higher significant marginal bone loss than the straight implant on the prosthesis and 6 months after loading. However, angulated implants can be a satisfactory alternative to vertical implants to avoid transplant procedures.","PeriodicalId":117944,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Dental Implant Angulation on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Maxillary Area\",\"authors\":\"I. Metwally, A. Elfeky, A. Hosny\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the marginal bone loss in the angled implant in the posterior maxillary region. Subjects and methods: A total of 14 implants, 7 angled implants and 7 straight implants in posterior maxilla with surgical guide were placed. Seven patients ranged in age between 40.0 – 43.0 years with a mean age of 41.71 ± 1.25 years for angulated implant group; and seven patients ranged in age between 44.0 – 45.0 years with a mean age 44.43 ± 0.53 years for straight implant group. Flap less approach through surgical guide with angulation 25-30 for angled implant and straight implant without angulation. Results: Angulated implant showed a higher significant buccal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Angulated implant showed a higher significant palatal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Conclusion : The angled implant showed a higher significant marginal bone loss than the straight implant on the prosthesis and 6 months after loading. However, angulated implants can be a satisfactory alternative to vertical implants to avoid transplant procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨上颌后牙种植体的边缘骨丢失情况。对象和方法:在手术引导下放置上颌后牙种植体14个,角种植体7个,直种植体7个。7例患者年龄40.0 ~ 43.0岁,成角种植体组平均年龄41.71±1.25岁;7例患者年龄44.0 ~ 45.0岁,直种植组平均年龄44.43±0.53岁。对于有角度种植体和无角度种植体,采用25-30角度的手术引导无皮瓣入路。结果:成角种植体在假体和装填后6个月的颊缘骨损失明显高于直种植体。成角种植体在假体和装填后6个月的腭缘骨损失明显高于直种植体。结论:在装填后6个月,角度种植体的边缘骨丢失明显高于直线种植体。然而,成角种植体可以是令人满意的替代垂直种植体,以避免移植手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Dental Implant Angulation on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Maxillary Area
Objective: To assess the marginal bone loss in the angled implant in the posterior maxillary region. Subjects and methods: A total of 14 implants, 7 angled implants and 7 straight implants in posterior maxilla with surgical guide were placed. Seven patients ranged in age between 40.0 – 43.0 years with a mean age of 41.71 ± 1.25 years for angulated implant group; and seven patients ranged in age between 44.0 – 45.0 years with a mean age 44.43 ± 0.53 years for straight implant group. Flap less approach through surgical guide with angulation 25-30 for angled implant and straight implant without angulation. Results: Angulated implant showed a higher significant buccal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Angulated implant showed a higher significant palatal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Conclusion : The angled implant showed a higher significant marginal bone loss than the straight implant on the prosthesis and 6 months after loading. However, angulated implants can be a satisfactory alternative to vertical implants to avoid transplant procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信