{"title":"种植体成角对上颌后缘骨丢失的影响","authors":"I. Metwally, A. Elfeky, A. Hosny","doi":"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the marginal bone loss in the angled implant in the posterior maxillary region. Subjects and methods: A total of 14 implants, 7 angled implants and 7 straight implants in posterior maxilla with surgical guide were placed. Seven patients ranged in age between 40.0 – 43.0 years with a mean age of 41.71 ± 1.25 years for angulated implant group; and seven patients ranged in age between 44.0 – 45.0 years with a mean age 44.43 ± 0.53 years for straight implant group. Flap less approach through surgical guide with angulation 25-30 for angled implant and straight implant without angulation. Results: Angulated implant showed a higher significant buccal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Angulated implant showed a higher significant palatal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Conclusion : The angled implant showed a higher significant marginal bone loss than the straight implant on the prosthesis and 6 months after loading. However, angulated implants can be a satisfactory alternative to vertical implants to avoid transplant procedures.","PeriodicalId":117944,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Dental Implant Angulation on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Maxillary Area\",\"authors\":\"I. Metwally, A. Elfeky, A. Hosny\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the marginal bone loss in the angled implant in the posterior maxillary region. Subjects and methods: A total of 14 implants, 7 angled implants and 7 straight implants in posterior maxilla with surgical guide were placed. Seven patients ranged in age between 40.0 – 43.0 years with a mean age of 41.71 ± 1.25 years for angulated implant group; and seven patients ranged in age between 44.0 – 45.0 years with a mean age 44.43 ± 0.53 years for straight implant group. Flap less approach through surgical guide with angulation 25-30 for angled implant and straight implant without angulation. Results: Angulated implant showed a higher significant buccal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Angulated implant showed a higher significant palatal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Conclusion : The angled implant showed a higher significant marginal bone loss than the straight implant on the prosthesis and 6 months after loading. However, angulated implants can be a satisfactory alternative to vertical implants to avoid transplant procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Dental Implant Angulation on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Maxillary Area
Objective: To assess the marginal bone loss in the angled implant in the posterior maxillary region. Subjects and methods: A total of 14 implants, 7 angled implants and 7 straight implants in posterior maxilla with surgical guide were placed. Seven patients ranged in age between 40.0 – 43.0 years with a mean age of 41.71 ± 1.25 years for angulated implant group; and seven patients ranged in age between 44.0 – 45.0 years with a mean age 44.43 ± 0.53 years for straight implant group. Flap less approach through surgical guide with angulation 25-30 for angled implant and straight implant without angulation. Results: Angulated implant showed a higher significant buccal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Angulated implant showed a higher significant palatal marginal bone loss than straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Conclusion : The angled implant showed a higher significant marginal bone loss than the straight implant on the prosthesis and 6 months after loading. However, angulated implants can be a satisfactory alternative to vertical implants to avoid transplant procedures.