基于实体的文档检索相关反馈

Eilon Sheetrit, Fiana Raiber, Oren Kurland
{"title":"基于实体的文档检索相关反馈","authors":"Eilon Sheetrit, Fiana Raiber, Oren Kurland","doi":"10.1145/3578337.3605128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a long history of work on using relevance feedback for ad hoc document retrieval. The main types of relevance feedback studied thus far are for documents, passages and terms. We explore the merits of using relevance feedback provided for entities in an entity repository. We devise retrieval methods that can utilize relevance feedback provided for tokens whether entities or terms. Empirical evaluation shows that using entity relevance feedback falls short with respect to utilizing term feedback on average, but is much more effective for difficult queries. Furthermore, integrating term and entity relevance feedback is of clear merit; e.g., for augmenting minimal document feedback. We also contrast approaches to presenting entities and terms for soliciting relevance feedback.","PeriodicalId":415621,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entity-Based Relevance Feedback for Document Retrieval\",\"authors\":\"Eilon Sheetrit, Fiana Raiber, Oren Kurland\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3578337.3605128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a long history of work on using relevance feedback for ad hoc document retrieval. The main types of relevance feedback studied thus far are for documents, passages and terms. We explore the merits of using relevance feedback provided for entities in an entity repository. We devise retrieval methods that can utilize relevance feedback provided for tokens whether entities or terms. Empirical evaluation shows that using entity relevance feedback falls short with respect to utilizing term feedback on average, but is much more effective for difficult queries. Furthermore, integrating term and entity relevance feedback is of clear merit; e.g., for augmenting minimal document feedback. We also contrast approaches to presenting entities and terms for soliciting relevance feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3578337.3605128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3578337.3605128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在使用相关反馈进行特殊文档检索方面已有很长的研究历史。目前研究的相关反馈类型主要有文献、段落和术语。我们探讨了在实体存储库中使用为实体提供的相关反馈的优点。我们设计了检索方法,可以利用为实体或术语的令牌提供的相关反馈。经验评估表明,平均而言,使用实体相关反馈与使用术语反馈相比不足,但对于困难的查询更有效。此外,将术语和实体相关反馈相结合的方法具有明显的优点;例如,增加最小的文档反馈。我们还对比了呈现实体和征求相关反馈的术语的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entity-Based Relevance Feedback for Document Retrieval
There is a long history of work on using relevance feedback for ad hoc document retrieval. The main types of relevance feedback studied thus far are for documents, passages and terms. We explore the merits of using relevance feedback provided for entities in an entity repository. We devise retrieval methods that can utilize relevance feedback provided for tokens whether entities or terms. Empirical evaluation shows that using entity relevance feedback falls short with respect to utilizing term feedback on average, but is much more effective for difficult queries. Furthermore, integrating term and entity relevance feedback is of clear merit; e.g., for augmenting minimal document feedback. We also contrast approaches to presenting entities and terms for soliciting relevance feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信