基于两两比较的群体决策新方法

M. Azadfallah, M. Azizi
{"title":"基于两两比较的群体决策新方法","authors":"M. Azadfallah, M. Azizi","doi":"10.1504/jibed.2015.070445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A review of the supplier selection literature shows that the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method is one of the most commonly applied methods in practice. However, a major drawback in applying AHP is that the required comparisons rises quadratically with the entities to be compared. In this paper, to resolve this limitation, a new approach is proposed. In the proposed model, the following ways for deriving priorities are suggested: i) decomposition of matrix method; ii) the geometric mean method. The finding in this paper shows that decomposing matrix method results are more reliable than others.","PeriodicalId":133038,"journal":{"name":"J. for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach in group decision-making based on pairwise comparisons\",\"authors\":\"M. Azadfallah, M. Azizi\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/jibed.2015.070445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A review of the supplier selection literature shows that the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method is one of the most commonly applied methods in practice. However, a major drawback in applying AHP is that the required comparisons rises quadratically with the entities to be compared. In this paper, to resolve this limitation, a new approach is proposed. In the proposed model, the following ways for deriving priorities are suggested: i) decomposition of matrix method; ii) the geometric mean method. The finding in this paper shows that decomposing matrix method results are more reliable than others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/jibed.2015.070445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/jibed.2015.070445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过对供应商选择相关文献的回顾,发现层次分析法(AHP)是目前最常用的供应商选择方法之一。然而,应用AHP的一个主要缺点是,所需的比较随着要比较的实体呈二次增长。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种新的方法。在该模型中,提出了以下几种确定优先级的方法:1)矩阵分解法;Ii)几何平均法。本文的研究结果表明,分解矩阵法的结果比其他方法更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new approach in group decision-making based on pairwise comparisons
A review of the supplier selection literature shows that the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method is one of the most commonly applied methods in practice. However, a major drawback in applying AHP is that the required comparisons rises quadratically with the entities to be compared. In this paper, to resolve this limitation, a new approach is proposed. In the proposed model, the following ways for deriving priorities are suggested: i) decomposition of matrix method; ii) the geometric mean method. The finding in this paper shows that decomposing matrix method results are more reliable than others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信