审计合伙人对财务报告的影响:来自美国银行控股公司的证据

G. Bhat, Hemang Desai, W. Frame, Christoffer Koch, Erik J. Mayer
{"title":"审计合伙人对财务报告的影响:来自美国银行控股公司的证据","authors":"G. Bhat, Hemang Desai, W. Frame, Christoffer Koch, Erik J. Mayer","doi":"10.24149/wp2209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses confidential data on audit engagement partner names from regulatory filings of bank holding companies (BHC) to investigate whether partners display individual style that affects the financial reporting of the BHCs. We focus on loan loss provisioning. We construct an audit partner-BHC matched panel data set that enables us to track different partners across different BHCs over time. We employ two empirical approaches to investigate partner style. The first approach tests whether partner fixed effects are statistically significant in loan loss provisioning models. The second approach tests whether a partner’s history of loan loss provisioning predicts future practices for the same partner. Our empirical evidence does not support systematic differences in loan loss provisioning across audit engagement partners, suggesting that the audit firm’s standards and quality control constrain personal partner style. of the real estate, commercial, and consumer loans in the loan portfolio. The results are similar to those for the two primary variables","PeriodicalId":322311,"journal":{"name":"Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Audit Partners on Financial Reporting: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies\",\"authors\":\"G. Bhat, Hemang Desai, W. Frame, Christoffer Koch, Erik J. Mayer\",\"doi\":\"10.24149/wp2209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses confidential data on audit engagement partner names from regulatory filings of bank holding companies (BHC) to investigate whether partners display individual style that affects the financial reporting of the BHCs. We focus on loan loss provisioning. We construct an audit partner-BHC matched panel data set that enables us to track different partners across different BHCs over time. We employ two empirical approaches to investigate partner style. The first approach tests whether partner fixed effects are statistically significant in loan loss provisioning models. The second approach tests whether a partner’s history of loan loss provisioning predicts future practices for the same partner. Our empirical evidence does not support systematic differences in loan loss provisioning across audit engagement partners, suggesting that the audit firm’s standards and quality control constrain personal partner style. of the real estate, commercial, and consumer loans in the loan portfolio. The results are similar to those for the two primary variables\",\"PeriodicalId\":322311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文利用银行控股公司(BHC)监管文件中审计业务合伙人姓名的保密数据,调查合伙人是否表现出影响BHC财务报告的个人风格。我们专注于贷款损失准备。我们构建了一个审计合作伙伴- bhc匹配的面板数据集,使我们能够长期跟踪不同bhc的不同合作伙伴。我们采用两种实证方法来调查合作伙伴的风格。第一种方法检验合伙人固定效应在贷款损失准备模型中是否具有统计学意义。第二种方法是测试合作伙伴的贷款损失拨备历史是否可以预测该合作伙伴的未来业务。我们的经验证据并不支持不同审计业务合伙人在贷款损失准备方面存在系统性差异,这表明审计事务所的标准和质量控制限制了个人合伙人的风格。贷款组合中的房地产、商业和消费贷款。结果与两个主要变量的结果相似
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Audit Partners on Financial Reporting: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies
This paper uses confidential data on audit engagement partner names from regulatory filings of bank holding companies (BHC) to investigate whether partners display individual style that affects the financial reporting of the BHCs. We focus on loan loss provisioning. We construct an audit partner-BHC matched panel data set that enables us to track different partners across different BHCs over time. We employ two empirical approaches to investigate partner style. The first approach tests whether partner fixed effects are statistically significant in loan loss provisioning models. The second approach tests whether a partner’s history of loan loss provisioning predicts future practices for the same partner. Our empirical evidence does not support systematic differences in loan loss provisioning across audit engagement partners, suggesting that the audit firm’s standards and quality control constrain personal partner style. of the real estate, commercial, and consumer loans in the loan portfolio. The results are similar to those for the two primary variables
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信