如何阻止错误信息在社交媒体上的传播:Facebook计划vs.右键验证方法

Pardis Pourghomi, F. Safieddine, Wassim Masri, Milan Dordevic
{"title":"如何阻止错误信息在社交媒体上的传播:Facebook计划vs.右键验证方法","authors":"Pardis Pourghomi, F. Safieddine, Wassim Masri, Milan Dordevic","doi":"10.1109/ICEMIS.2017.8272957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key features of social networks is that users are able to share information, and through cascades of sharing information, this information may reach a large number of individuals. The high availability of user-provided contents on online social media facilitates people aggregation around shared beliefs, interests, worldviews and narratives. With lack of means to verify information, social media has been accused of becoming a hot bed for sharing of misinformation. Facebook, as one of the largest social networking services, has been facing widespread criticism on how its newsfeed algorithm is designed thus amplifying dissemination of misinformation. In late 2016, Facebook revealed plans to address fake news on Facebook newsfeeds. In this work, we study the methods Facebook has proposed to combat the spread of misinformation and compare it with our previously proposed approach called ‘Right-click Authenticate’. By analyzing the Business Process Modeling and Notation of both approaches, this paper suggests some key weaknesses and improvements social media companies need to consider when tackling the spread of misinformation online.","PeriodicalId":117908,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS)","volume":"332 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to stop spread of misinformation on social media: Facebook plans vs. right-click authenticate approach\",\"authors\":\"Pardis Pourghomi, F. Safieddine, Wassim Masri, Milan Dordevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEMIS.2017.8272957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the key features of social networks is that users are able to share information, and through cascades of sharing information, this information may reach a large number of individuals. The high availability of user-provided contents on online social media facilitates people aggregation around shared beliefs, interests, worldviews and narratives. With lack of means to verify information, social media has been accused of becoming a hot bed for sharing of misinformation. Facebook, as one of the largest social networking services, has been facing widespread criticism on how its newsfeed algorithm is designed thus amplifying dissemination of misinformation. In late 2016, Facebook revealed plans to address fake news on Facebook newsfeeds. In this work, we study the methods Facebook has proposed to combat the spread of misinformation and compare it with our previously proposed approach called ‘Right-click Authenticate’. By analyzing the Business Process Modeling and Notation of both approaches, this paper suggests some key weaknesses and improvements social media companies need to consider when tackling the spread of misinformation online.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS)\",\"volume\":\"332 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMIS.2017.8272957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMIS.2017.8272957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

社交网络的一个关键特征是用户能够分享信息,通过分享信息的级联,这些信息可能会接触到大量的个人。在线社交媒体上用户提供的内容的高可用性促进了人们围绕共同的信仰、兴趣、世界观和叙述聚集在一起。由于缺乏核实信息的手段,社交媒体被指责为分享错误信息的温床。作为最大的社交网络服务之一,Facebook因其新闻推送算法的设计放大了错误信息的传播而面临广泛批评。2016年底,脸书公布了解决脸书新闻推送中的假新闻的计划。在这项工作中,我们研究了Facebook提出的打击错误信息传播的方法,并将其与我们之前提出的名为“右键验证”的方法进行了比较。通过分析两种方法的业务流程建模和符号,本文提出了社交媒体公司在处理在线错误信息传播时需要考虑的一些关键弱点和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to stop spread of misinformation on social media: Facebook plans vs. right-click authenticate approach
One of the key features of social networks is that users are able to share information, and through cascades of sharing information, this information may reach a large number of individuals. The high availability of user-provided contents on online social media facilitates people aggregation around shared beliefs, interests, worldviews and narratives. With lack of means to verify information, social media has been accused of becoming a hot bed for sharing of misinformation. Facebook, as one of the largest social networking services, has been facing widespread criticism on how its newsfeed algorithm is designed thus amplifying dissemination of misinformation. In late 2016, Facebook revealed plans to address fake news on Facebook newsfeeds. In this work, we study the methods Facebook has proposed to combat the spread of misinformation and compare it with our previously proposed approach called ‘Right-click Authenticate’. By analyzing the Business Process Modeling and Notation of both approaches, this paper suggests some key weaknesses and improvements social media companies need to consider when tackling the spread of misinformation online.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信