斯里兰卡选定政府网站的可用性和可访问性分析

Gopinath Sittampalam, V. Senthooran, N. Lojenaa, T. Kartheeswaran
{"title":"斯里兰卡选定政府网站的可用性和可访问性分析","authors":"Gopinath Sittampalam, V. Senthooran, N. Lojenaa, T. Kartheeswaran","doi":"10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2016.7519439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The websites usability and accessibility standards make more convenient to the internet users. The most of exists websites are failed to follow these standards. Hence, in this research study, we analyze the usability and accessibility standards of highly used websites of Sri Lankan government. The forty-seven government websites are selected to investigate the usability and accessibility guidelines. The above-mentioned guidelines were analyzed using standard online web analytical tools such as WAVE, googlePageSpeed insight, google Mobile-Friendly Test, Pingdom tool, and PowerMapper. Further, the results were analyzed using a weighted method to predict the standard level of the websites.","PeriodicalId":166275,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability and accessibility analysis of selected government websites in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Gopinath Sittampalam, V. Senthooran, N. Lojenaa, T. Kartheeswaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2016.7519439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The websites usability and accessibility standards make more convenient to the internet users. The most of exists websites are failed to follow these standards. Hence, in this research study, we analyze the usability and accessibility standards of highly used websites of Sri Lankan government. The forty-seven government websites are selected to investigate the usability and accessibility guidelines. The above-mentioned guidelines were analyzed using standard online web analytical tools such as WAVE, googlePageSpeed insight, google Mobile-Friendly Test, Pingdom tool, and PowerMapper. Further, the results were analyzed using a weighted method to predict the standard level of the websites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2016.7519439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2016.7519439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

网站的可用性和可访问性标准为互联网用户提供了更多的便利。现有的大多数网站都没有遵循这些标准。因此,在本研究中,我们分析了斯里兰卡政府高使用率网站的可用性和可访问性标准。选取四十七个政府网站,调查网站的可用性和易读性指引。上述指南使用标准的在线网络分析工具(如WAVE、googlepagespeedinsight、google Mobile-Friendly Test、Pingdom工具和PowerMapper)进行分析。进一步,利用加权法对结果进行分析,预测网站的标准水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability and accessibility analysis of selected government websites in Sri Lanka
The websites usability and accessibility standards make more convenient to the internet users. The most of exists websites are failed to follow these standards. Hence, in this research study, we analyze the usability and accessibility standards of highly used websites of Sri Lankan government. The forty-seven government websites are selected to investigate the usability and accessibility guidelines. The above-mentioned guidelines were analyzed using standard online web analytical tools such as WAVE, googlePageSpeed insight, google Mobile-Friendly Test, Pingdom tool, and PowerMapper. Further, the results were analyzed using a weighted method to predict the standard level of the websites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信