电子零售与金融科技:即时返回信贷

Rong Li, Duo Shi
{"title":"电子零售与金融科技:即时返回信贷","authors":"Rong Li, Duo Shi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3756627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem Definition: Instant return credit (in short, return-credit) is a new FinTech service that offers a store credit immediately upon a return claim, without requiring the return to be received. Improving consumers’ budget, this helps convert online returns into new sales, but it also results in costly fake returns from consumers with low credit-rating. We study whether or not and how retailers should adopt return-credit and its implications on their optimal pricing strategy and profit and consumers’ welfare. Academic/Practice Relevance: This return-credit service is recently launched by a startup FinTech company, Returnly, and adopted by many retailers with impressive results. This paper is the first to provide some necessary guidance for this new practice. Methodology: We build a stylized economic model to capture the basic dynamics and tradeoff of return-credit. For a retailer selling two horizontally differentiated products, we study and compare three different cases: no, unconditional and conditional (on consumer-type) return-credit. For each case, we first optimize the consumers’ sequential decisions involving orders and return and then optimize the retailer’s strategy on pricing and return-credit. Results: The retailer should adopt the return-credit service; when adopt, she should make the return-credit conditional if no additional cost required, regardless of the product category. She should also prepare to switch to an asymmetric pricing, although the two products are symmetric (in cost and consumer valuation). This adoption, however, may hurt all consumers for low-cost products due to the retailer’s elevated pricing power by return-credit. But, making the return- credit conditional on consumer-type will almost always reward high credit-rating consumers, but penalize low credit-rating consumers. Managerial Implications: Our results provide retailers with an initial guidance and insights on how to implement return-credit and its major implications on the retailer (significant strategy change and what product-category to start implement), and consumers (both types of return-credit may hurt, but the conditional one is fairer).","PeriodicalId":377322,"journal":{"name":"Investments eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-Tailing with FinTech: Instant Return Credit\",\"authors\":\"Rong Li, Duo Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3756627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem Definition: Instant return credit (in short, return-credit) is a new FinTech service that offers a store credit immediately upon a return claim, without requiring the return to be received. Improving consumers’ budget, this helps convert online returns into new sales, but it also results in costly fake returns from consumers with low credit-rating. We study whether or not and how retailers should adopt return-credit and its implications on their optimal pricing strategy and profit and consumers’ welfare. Academic/Practice Relevance: This return-credit service is recently launched by a startup FinTech company, Returnly, and adopted by many retailers with impressive results. This paper is the first to provide some necessary guidance for this new practice. Methodology: We build a stylized economic model to capture the basic dynamics and tradeoff of return-credit. For a retailer selling two horizontally differentiated products, we study and compare three different cases: no, unconditional and conditional (on consumer-type) return-credit. For each case, we first optimize the consumers’ sequential decisions involving orders and return and then optimize the retailer’s strategy on pricing and return-credit. Results: The retailer should adopt the return-credit service; when adopt, she should make the return-credit conditional if no additional cost required, regardless of the product category. She should also prepare to switch to an asymmetric pricing, although the two products are symmetric (in cost and consumer valuation). This adoption, however, may hurt all consumers for low-cost products due to the retailer’s elevated pricing power by return-credit. But, making the return- credit conditional on consumer-type will almost always reward high credit-rating consumers, but penalize low credit-rating consumers. Managerial Implications: Our results provide retailers with an initial guidance and insights on how to implement return-credit and its major implications on the retailer (significant strategy change and what product-category to start implement), and consumers (both types of return-credit may hurt, but the conditional one is fairer).\",\"PeriodicalId\":377322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investments eJournal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investments eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investments eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

问题定义:即时退货积分(简称退货积分)是一项新的金融科技服务,在退货申请后立即提供商店积分,而不需要收到退货。改善消费者的预算,这有助于将在线退货转化为新的销售,但也会导致信用评级较低的消费者产生昂贵的虚假退货。本文研究了零售商是否应该以及如何采用退货信用,以及退货信用对零售商最优定价策略、利润和消费者福利的影响。学术/实践相关性:这项退款信用服务最近由一家金融科技初创公司rereturn推出,并被许多零售商采用,取得了令人印象深刻的效果。本文首先为这一新的实践提供了一些必要的指导。方法:我们建立了一个程式化的经济模型来捕捉基本动态和回报-信贷的权衡。对于销售两种水平差异化产品的零售商,我们研究并比较了三种不同的情况:无、无条件和有条件(基于消费者类型)退货信用。对于每种情况,我们首先优化消费者的顺序决策,包括订单和退货,然后优化零售商的定价和退货信用策略。结果:零售商应采用退换货服务;当采用时,无论产品类别如何,如果不需要额外的费用,她都应该提出有条件的退货信用。她还应该准备转向不对称定价,尽管这两种产品是对称的(在成本和消费者估值方面)。然而,这种采用可能会损害所有低成本产品的消费者,因为零售商通过退货信用提高了定价能力。但是,将信用回报以消费者类型为条件,几乎总是会奖励高信用等级的消费者,而惩罚低信用等级的消费者。管理启示:我们的结果为零售商提供了关于如何实施退货信用及其对零售商(重大战略变化和开始实施的产品类别)和消费者(两种类型的退货信用都可能造成伤害,但有条件的退货信用更公平)的初步指导和见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
E-Tailing with FinTech: Instant Return Credit
Problem Definition: Instant return credit (in short, return-credit) is a new FinTech service that offers a store credit immediately upon a return claim, without requiring the return to be received. Improving consumers’ budget, this helps convert online returns into new sales, but it also results in costly fake returns from consumers with low credit-rating. We study whether or not and how retailers should adopt return-credit and its implications on their optimal pricing strategy and profit and consumers’ welfare. Academic/Practice Relevance: This return-credit service is recently launched by a startup FinTech company, Returnly, and adopted by many retailers with impressive results. This paper is the first to provide some necessary guidance for this new practice. Methodology: We build a stylized economic model to capture the basic dynamics and tradeoff of return-credit. For a retailer selling two horizontally differentiated products, we study and compare three different cases: no, unconditional and conditional (on consumer-type) return-credit. For each case, we first optimize the consumers’ sequential decisions involving orders and return and then optimize the retailer’s strategy on pricing and return-credit. Results: The retailer should adopt the return-credit service; when adopt, she should make the return-credit conditional if no additional cost required, regardless of the product category. She should also prepare to switch to an asymmetric pricing, although the two products are symmetric (in cost and consumer valuation). This adoption, however, may hurt all consumers for low-cost products due to the retailer’s elevated pricing power by return-credit. But, making the return- credit conditional on consumer-type will almost always reward high credit-rating consumers, but penalize low credit-rating consumers. Managerial Implications: Our results provide retailers with an initial guidance and insights on how to implement return-credit and its major implications on the retailer (significant strategy change and what product-category to start implement), and consumers (both types of return-credit may hurt, but the conditional one is fairer).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信