欧洲国家创新政策的社会和人道主义方面(以英国和芬兰为例)

© Кириченко, irina V. Kirichenko, Natalia V. Shelyubskaya
{"title":"欧洲国家创新政策的社会和人道主义方面(以英国和芬兰为例)","authors":"© Кириченко, irina V. Kirichenko, Natalia V. Shelyubskaya","doi":"10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.1.94-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: to study the approaches and priorities for innovation policy oriented to solve developed countries' social and humanitarian problems (case of the UK and Finland).Methods: due to the descriptive method the array of documents forming the innovation policy of the UK and Finland was determined and analysis singled out its social and humanitarian aspects. The historical method helped to trace the evolution of innovation policy. By the comparative method the goals and content of the innovation policy of the two countries were compared.Results: the UK and Finland face the same type of social and humanitarian challenges characterizing European countries. The authors hypothesized the similarity of the principles of responses to these challenges in the innovation policy of the two innovation-active countries, despite the differences in the fundamentals of the market economy functioning: minimal state intervention in the free market (the UK) and the economic processes regulation in the North Europe welfare state (Finland). An analysis of government documents relating to innovation policy, analytical reviews and statistical materials confirmed this assumption.Conclusions and Relevance: innovation policy as an institution has been examined for a long time but its social and humanitarian aspects are not yet sufficiently specified and presented in fragments. The study of the principles of socially oriented innovation policy in the UK and Finland expands the understanding of innovation policy's transformation that accelerates the transition of innovation activity from «technological determinism» to «social constructivism». A wide range of stakeholders are involved in that innovation policy's formation and implementation: the academic sector, business structures, and end users. The results of the study can be used to develop recommendations for improving Russia's innovation policy.","PeriodicalId":373043,"journal":{"name":"MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)","volume":"248 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social and humanitarian aspects of the innovation policy of European countries (Case of the UK and Finland)\",\"authors\":\"© Кириченко, irina V. Kirichenko, Natalia V. Shelyubskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.1.94-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: to study the approaches and priorities for innovation policy oriented to solve developed countries' social and humanitarian problems (case of the UK and Finland).Methods: due to the descriptive method the array of documents forming the innovation policy of the UK and Finland was determined and analysis singled out its social and humanitarian aspects. The historical method helped to trace the evolution of innovation policy. By the comparative method the goals and content of the innovation policy of the two countries were compared.Results: the UK and Finland face the same type of social and humanitarian challenges characterizing European countries. The authors hypothesized the similarity of the principles of responses to these challenges in the innovation policy of the two innovation-active countries, despite the differences in the fundamentals of the market economy functioning: minimal state intervention in the free market (the UK) and the economic processes regulation in the North Europe welfare state (Finland). An analysis of government documents relating to innovation policy, analytical reviews and statistical materials confirmed this assumption.Conclusions and Relevance: innovation policy as an institution has been examined for a long time but its social and humanitarian aspects are not yet sufficiently specified and presented in fragments. The study of the principles of socially oriented innovation policy in the UK and Finland expands the understanding of innovation policy's transformation that accelerates the transition of innovation activity from «technological determinism» to «social constructivism». A wide range of stakeholders are involved in that innovation policy's formation and implementation: the academic sector, business structures, and end users. The results of the study can be used to develop recommendations for improving Russia's innovation policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)\",\"volume\":\"248 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.1.94-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.1.94-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究面向解决发达国家社会和人道主义问题的创新政策的方法和优先事项(以英国和芬兰为例)。方法:由于描述性的方法,确定了形成英国和芬兰创新政策的文件阵列,并分析了其社会和人道主义方面。历史方法有助于追溯创新政策的演变。采用比较法对两国创新政策的目标和内容进行了比较。结果:英国和芬兰面临着与欧洲国家相同的社会和人道主义挑战。作者假设这两个创新活跃的国家的创新政策应对这些挑战的原则是相似的,尽管在市场经济运作的基本原理上存在差异:对自由市场的最小国家干预(英国)和北欧福利国家(芬兰)的经济过程监管。对有关创新政策的政府文件、分析审查和统计材料的分析证实了这一假设。结论和相关性:创新政策作为一种制度已经研究了很长时间,但其社会和人道主义方面尚未得到充分的具体说明,并以碎片形式提出。对英国和芬兰社会导向创新政策原则的研究扩展了对创新政策转型的理解,这种转型加速了创新活动从“技术决定论”向“社会建构主义”的转变。创新政策的形成和实施涉及广泛的利益相关者:学术部门、商业结构和最终用户。研究结果可用于制定改进俄罗斯创新政策的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social and humanitarian aspects of the innovation policy of European countries (Case of the UK and Finland)
Purpose: to study the approaches and priorities for innovation policy oriented to solve developed countries' social and humanitarian problems (case of the UK and Finland).Methods: due to the descriptive method the array of documents forming the innovation policy of the UK and Finland was determined and analysis singled out its social and humanitarian aspects. The historical method helped to trace the evolution of innovation policy. By the comparative method the goals and content of the innovation policy of the two countries were compared.Results: the UK and Finland face the same type of social and humanitarian challenges characterizing European countries. The authors hypothesized the similarity of the principles of responses to these challenges in the innovation policy of the two innovation-active countries, despite the differences in the fundamentals of the market economy functioning: minimal state intervention in the free market (the UK) and the economic processes regulation in the North Europe welfare state (Finland). An analysis of government documents relating to innovation policy, analytical reviews and statistical materials confirmed this assumption.Conclusions and Relevance: innovation policy as an institution has been examined for a long time but its social and humanitarian aspects are not yet sufficiently specified and presented in fragments. The study of the principles of socially oriented innovation policy in the UK and Finland expands the understanding of innovation policy's transformation that accelerates the transition of innovation activity from «technological determinism» to «social constructivism». A wide range of stakeholders are involved in that innovation policy's formation and implementation: the academic sector, business structures, and end users. The results of the study can be used to develop recommendations for improving Russia's innovation policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信