正式定义身份验证属性的不同方法

Zhen Song, Zhoujun Li, Wenhua Dou
{"title":"正式定义身份验证属性的不同方法","authors":"Zhen Song, Zhoujun Li, Wenhua Dou","doi":"10.1109/APCC.2003.1274481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security goals should be parts of the description of security protocols. If the security goal cannot be precisely described in the narration, formal verification will lose its sense. But unlike secrecy, authentication property is rarely made clear precisely what it means. Various approaches were previously proposed for the formal definition of authentication property. This article describes taxonomy of these different definitions and discusses their respective problems. It is intended to be a survey and arise some deeper research.","PeriodicalId":277507,"journal":{"name":"9th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.03EX732)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different approaches for the formal definition of authentication property\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Song, Zhoujun Li, Wenhua Dou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APCC.2003.1274481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Security goals should be parts of the description of security protocols. If the security goal cannot be precisely described in the narration, formal verification will lose its sense. But unlike secrecy, authentication property is rarely made clear precisely what it means. Various approaches were previously proposed for the formal definition of authentication property. This article describes taxonomy of these different definitions and discusses their respective problems. It is intended to be a survey and arise some deeper research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"9th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.03EX732)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"9th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.03EX732)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APCC.2003.1274481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.03EX732)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APCC.2003.1274481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

安全目标应该是安全协议描述的一部分。如果在叙述中不能精确地描述安全目标,形式验证就失去了意义。但与保密不同的是,身份验证属性很少被明确说明其确切含义。以前提出了各种方法来正式定义身份验证属性。本文描述了这些不同定义的分类,并讨论了它们各自存在的问题。它的目的是作为一个调查,并引起一些更深入的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different approaches for the formal definition of authentication property
Security goals should be parts of the description of security protocols. If the security goal cannot be precisely described in the narration, formal verification will lose its sense. But unlike secrecy, authentication property is rarely made clear precisely what it means. Various approaches were previously proposed for the formal definition of authentication property. This article describes taxonomy of these different definitions and discusses their respective problems. It is intended to be a survey and arise some deeper research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信