大规模全权委托信托

Lionel R. Smith
{"title":"大规模全权委托信托","authors":"Lionel R. Smith","doi":"10.1093/clp/cuw014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trust drafting practices have changed dramatically in recent decades. A range of considerations has led to an increase in the dispositive discretions held by trustees. In some cases, the trustees’ dispositive discretions effectively govern the whole trust structure, leading to what the author calls a ‘massively discretionary trust’. These trusts create a series of legal risks. These include the possibility that the trust property is held on resulting trust from the moment of the trust’s constitution and the possibility that the beneficiaries can collapse the trust and take the trust property. Some drafting techniques may be based on a misunderstanding of the law; some may invite litigation; and the governing legal principles, as understood by some drafters, may be subject to revision and refinement by the courts. This paper will examine some of these possibilities using concrete examples.","PeriodicalId":285784,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Economics of Contract: Theory (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Massively Discretionary Trusts\",\"authors\":\"Lionel R. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clp/cuw014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trust drafting practices have changed dramatically in recent decades. A range of considerations has led to an increase in the dispositive discretions held by trustees. In some cases, the trustees’ dispositive discretions effectively govern the whole trust structure, leading to what the author calls a ‘massively discretionary trust’. These trusts create a series of legal risks. These include the possibility that the trust property is held on resulting trust from the moment of the trust’s constitution and the possibility that the beneficiaries can collapse the trust and take the trust property. Some drafting techniques may be based on a misunderstanding of the law; some may invite litigation; and the governing legal principles, as understood by some drafters, may be subject to revision and refinement by the courts. This paper will examine some of these possibilities using concrete examples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Economics of Contract: Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Economics of Contract: Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuw014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Economics of Contract: Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuw014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近几十年来,信托起草实践发生了巨大变化。一系列的考虑导致受托人拥有更多的自由裁量权。在某些情况下,受托人的自由裁量权有效地控制了整个信托结构,导致了作者所说的“大规模自由裁量信托”。这些信托产生了一系列法律风险。这包括从信托成立之日起信托财产就由由此产生的信托持有的可能性,以及受益人解散信托并取得信托财产的可能性。一些起草技巧可能是基于对法律的误解;有些可能会引发诉讼;一些起草者所理解的支配性法律原则可能会受到法院的修订和完善。本文将用具体的例子来检验其中的一些可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Massively Discretionary Trusts
Trust drafting practices have changed dramatically in recent decades. A range of considerations has led to an increase in the dispositive discretions held by trustees. In some cases, the trustees’ dispositive discretions effectively govern the whole trust structure, leading to what the author calls a ‘massively discretionary trust’. These trusts create a series of legal risks. These include the possibility that the trust property is held on resulting trust from the moment of the trust’s constitution and the possibility that the beneficiaries can collapse the trust and take the trust property. Some drafting techniques may be based on a misunderstanding of the law; some may invite litigation; and the governing legal principles, as understood by some drafters, may be subject to revision and refinement by the courts. This paper will examine some of these possibilities using concrete examples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信