表格数据

Naomi Altman
{"title":"表格数据","authors":"Naomi Altman","doi":"10.1515/9783112524725-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correction to: Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4239, published online 30 March 2017 The published version of this article contains a mathematical error. In the discussion of z tests in the fourth paragraph, the same z score is incorrectly given for both AA and aa; the last two sentences of the paragraph should read as follows: “For example, for AA the z score of the difference is 3.75/√6.25 = 1.5, yielding P = 0.13. However, for aa the same computation yields –16.25/√56.25 = –2.167 and P = 0.03.”","PeriodicalId":329212,"journal":{"name":"The Wind of Change in Central Australia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1965-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tabular Data\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Altman\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783112524725-019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correction to: Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4239, published online 30 March 2017 The published version of this article contains a mathematical error. In the discussion of z tests in the fourth paragraph, the same z score is incorrectly given for both AA and aa; the last two sentences of the paragraph should read as follows: “For example, for AA the z score of the difference is 3.75/√6.25 = 1.5, yielding P = 0.13. However, for aa the same computation yields –16.25/√56.25 = –2.167 and P = 0.03.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":329212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Wind of Change in Central Australia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1965-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Wind of Change in Central Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112524725-019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Wind of Change in Central Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112524725-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

更正:Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4239, 2017年3月30日在线发布本文的发布版本包含数学错误。在第四段关于z测试的讨论中,错误地给出了AA和AA的相同z分数;该段的最后两句应该这样读:“例如,对于AA,差异的z分数为3.75/√6.25 = 1.5,得到P = 0.13。然而,对于aa,同样的计算结果为-16.25 /√56.25 = -2.167,P = 0.03。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tabular Data
Correction to: Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4239, published online 30 March 2017 The published version of this article contains a mathematical error. In the discussion of z tests in the fourth paragraph, the same z score is incorrectly given for both AA and aa; the last two sentences of the paragraph should read as follows: “For example, for AA the z score of the difference is 3.75/√6.25 = 1.5, yielding P = 0.13. However, for aa the same computation yields –16.25/√56.25 = –2.167 and P = 0.03.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信