{"title":"表格数据","authors":"Naomi Altman","doi":"10.1515/9783112524725-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correction to: Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4239, published online 30 March 2017 The published version of this article contains a mathematical error. In the discussion of z tests in the fourth paragraph, the same z score is incorrectly given for both AA and aa; the last two sentences of the paragraph should read as follows: “For example, for AA the z score of the difference is 3.75/√6.25 = 1.5, yielding P = 0.13. However, for aa the same computation yields –16.25/√56.25 = –2.167 and P = 0.03.”","PeriodicalId":329212,"journal":{"name":"The Wind of Change in Central Australia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1965-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tabular Data\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Altman\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783112524725-019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correction to: Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4239, published online 30 March 2017 The published version of this article contains a mathematical error. In the discussion of z tests in the fourth paragraph, the same z score is incorrectly given for both AA and aa; the last two sentences of the paragraph should read as follows: “For example, for AA the z score of the difference is 3.75/√6.25 = 1.5, yielding P = 0.13. However, for aa the same computation yields –16.25/√56.25 = –2.167 and P = 0.03.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":329212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Wind of Change in Central Australia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1965-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Wind of Change in Central Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112524725-019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Wind of Change in Central Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112524725-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correction to: Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4239, published online 30 March 2017 The published version of this article contains a mathematical error. In the discussion of z tests in the fourth paragraph, the same z score is incorrectly given for both AA and aa; the last two sentences of the paragraph should read as follows: “For example, for AA the z score of the difference is 3.75/√6.25 = 1.5, yielding P = 0.13. However, for aa the same computation yields –16.25/√56.25 = –2.167 and P = 0.03.”