在法律上远离物性:动物作为一个新的法律类别?

Margot Michel
{"title":"在法律上远离物性:动物作为一个新的法律类别?","authors":"Margot Michel","doi":"10.58590/leoh.2023.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of what legal status animals have has preoccupied the law for centuries. Most legal systems classify animals among objects and as “things”. This has far-reaching implications on how they can be treated. In particular, the question of commercialisation, i.e. (almost) unlimited use, is closely linked to the status of being a thing and thus, also property. In recent years, many European legal systems have taken the first, albeit still rather tentative, steps towards de-reification of animals. What they look like and what they mean in concrete terms, but also what they might mean in the future, is the subject of this article.","PeriodicalId":350853,"journal":{"name":"LEOH - Journal of Animal Law, Ethics and One Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving Away from Thinghood in Law: Animals as a New Legal Category?\",\"authors\":\"Margot Michel\",\"doi\":\"10.58590/leoh.2023.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The question of what legal status animals have has preoccupied the law for centuries. Most legal systems classify animals among objects and as “things”. This has far-reaching implications on how they can be treated. In particular, the question of commercialisation, i.e. (almost) unlimited use, is closely linked to the status of being a thing and thus, also property. In recent years, many European legal systems have taken the first, albeit still rather tentative, steps towards de-reification of animals. What they look like and what they mean in concrete terms, but also what they might mean in the future, is the subject of this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEOH - Journal of Animal Law, Ethics and One Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEOH - Journal of Animal Law, Ethics and One Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58590/leoh.2023.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEOH - Journal of Animal Law, Ethics and One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58590/leoh.2023.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几个世纪以来,动物的法律地位问题一直困扰着法律。大多数法律制度将动物归类为物体和“事物”。这对如何治疗这些疾病有着深远的影响。特别是,商业化的问题,即(几乎)无限制的使用,与作为一件东西的地位密切相关,因此也与财产密切相关。近年来,许多欧洲法律体系已经迈出了第一步,尽管仍是试探性的,朝着动物非物化的方向迈出了一步。它们的外观和具体含义以及它们将来可能的含义是本文的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving Away from Thinghood in Law: Animals as a New Legal Category?
The question of what legal status animals have has preoccupied the law for centuries. Most legal systems classify animals among objects and as “things”. This has far-reaching implications on how they can be treated. In particular, the question of commercialisation, i.e. (almost) unlimited use, is closely linked to the status of being a thing and thus, also property. In recent years, many European legal systems have taken the first, albeit still rather tentative, steps towards de-reification of animals. What they look like and what they mean in concrete terms, but also what they might mean in the future, is the subject of this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信