锥形套管针在脊髓麻醉中有优势吗?

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1990-07-01
J Büttner, K P Wresch, R Klose
{"title":"锥形套管针在脊髓麻醉中有优势吗?","authors":"J Büttner,&nbsp;K P Wresch,&nbsp;R Klose","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The so-called atraumatic spinal cannula of Sprotte is a modification of the Whitacre spinal needle. It consists of a conical tip with a lateral opening. This cannula (24 G) is said to cause a very low incidence of postspinal headache. In a prospective study, it was compared to a 25 G cannula with a Quincke tip. PATIENTS AND METHOD. The study was carried out on 500 patients who received spinal anesthesia for operations on the lower extremities. The cannulas were randomly assigned to the patients. Puncture characteristics and number of incomplete blocks were evaluated. Postoperatively patients were interviewed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Neither the subjects nor the investigator were aware of the type of cannula used. RESULTS. There were no differences with regard to age and sex; 80% of the patients ranged between 15 and 55 years, with a homogeneous spread. Performance of the block was superior with the Sprotte cannula and the incidence of incomplete blocks was lower (1.6% vs 7.8%, P = 0.0011). There was no significant difference with regard to postspinal headache (8.2% vs 7.8%). CONCLUSIONS. The atraumatic cannula had better puncture characteristics, but there was no statistically significant difference with regard to postspinal headaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"13 5","pages":"124-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Does a cone-shaped cannula needle offer an advantage in spinal anesthesia?].\",\"authors\":\"J Büttner,&nbsp;K P Wresch,&nbsp;R Klose\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The so-called atraumatic spinal cannula of Sprotte is a modification of the Whitacre spinal needle. It consists of a conical tip with a lateral opening. This cannula (24 G) is said to cause a very low incidence of postspinal headache. In a prospective study, it was compared to a 25 G cannula with a Quincke tip. PATIENTS AND METHOD. The study was carried out on 500 patients who received spinal anesthesia for operations on the lower extremities. The cannulas were randomly assigned to the patients. Puncture characteristics and number of incomplete blocks were evaluated. Postoperatively patients were interviewed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Neither the subjects nor the investigator were aware of the type of cannula used. RESULTS. There were no differences with regard to age and sex; 80% of the patients ranged between 15 and 55 years, with a homogeneous spread. Performance of the block was superior with the Sprotte cannula and the incidence of incomplete blocks was lower (1.6% vs 7.8%, P = 0.0011). There was no significant difference with regard to postspinal headache (8.2% vs 7.8%). CONCLUSIONS. The atraumatic cannula had better puncture characteristics, but there was no statistically significant difference with regard to postspinal headaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"124-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所谓的Sprotte无创伤脊髓插管是Whitacre脊髓针的改良版。它由一个有侧面开口的锥形尖端组成。这种套管(24g)据说引起脊髓后头痛的发生率很低。在一项前瞻性研究中,将其与带有Quincke尖端的25g套管进行了比较。患者和方法。这项研究对500名因下肢手术而接受脊髓麻醉的患者进行了调查。套管是随机分配给患者的。评估穿刺特征和不完整块的数量。术后1、3、5、7天随访患者。受试者和研究者都不知道所使用的套管类型。结果。在年龄和性别方面没有差异;80%的患者年龄在15 - 55岁之间,分布均匀。Sprotte套管的阻滞性能更好,不完全阻滞的发生率更低(1.6% vs 7.8%, P = 0.0011)。在脊柱后头痛方面,两组无显著差异(8.2% vs 7.8%)。结论。无创插管具有更好的穿刺特性,但在脊髓后头痛方面无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Does a cone-shaped cannula needle offer an advantage in spinal anesthesia?].

The so-called atraumatic spinal cannula of Sprotte is a modification of the Whitacre spinal needle. It consists of a conical tip with a lateral opening. This cannula (24 G) is said to cause a very low incidence of postspinal headache. In a prospective study, it was compared to a 25 G cannula with a Quincke tip. PATIENTS AND METHOD. The study was carried out on 500 patients who received spinal anesthesia for operations on the lower extremities. The cannulas were randomly assigned to the patients. Puncture characteristics and number of incomplete blocks were evaluated. Postoperatively patients were interviewed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Neither the subjects nor the investigator were aware of the type of cannula used. RESULTS. There were no differences with regard to age and sex; 80% of the patients ranged between 15 and 55 years, with a homogeneous spread. Performance of the block was superior with the Sprotte cannula and the incidence of incomplete blocks was lower (1.6% vs 7.8%, P = 0.0011). There was no significant difference with regard to postspinal headache (8.2% vs 7.8%). CONCLUSIONS. The atraumatic cannula had better puncture characteristics, but there was no statistically significant difference with regard to postspinal headaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信