软件运行时过程的形式化表示与比较分析

O. Baranovskiy, R. Tkalenko
{"title":"软件运行时过程的形式化表示与比较分析","authors":"O. Baranovskiy, R. Tkalenko","doi":"10.15550/ASJ.2015.02.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a software tracing frameworks we obtain sequences of system calls produced during the execution of the pair of programs. We then transform the sequences of system calls into the symbolic sequences and apply a set of string metrics to them. We experimentally compare metrics on the task of differentiating the sources of sequences. We investigate various metrics including edit-distance metrics and hybrid methods. Overall, the best-performing metric is a cosine distance, resulting in order-of-magnitude different values for input pairs of different degrees of similarity.","PeriodicalId":403624,"journal":{"name":"The Advanced Science Journal","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Representation and Comparative Analysis of Software Runtime Process\",\"authors\":\"O. Baranovskiy, R. Tkalenko\",\"doi\":\"10.15550/ASJ.2015.02.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a software tracing frameworks we obtain sequences of system calls produced during the execution of the pair of programs. We then transform the sequences of system calls into the symbolic sequences and apply a set of string metrics to them. We experimentally compare metrics on the task of differentiating the sources of sequences. We investigate various metrics including edit-distance metrics and hybrid methods. Overall, the best-performing metric is a cosine distance, resulting in order-of-magnitude different values for input pairs of different degrees of similarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Advanced Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Advanced Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15550/ASJ.2015.02.038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Advanced Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15550/ASJ.2015.02.038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用软件跟踪框架,我们获得在这对程序执行期间产生的系统调用序列。然后将系统调用序列转换为符号序列,并对其应用一组字符串度量。我们实验比较了在区分序列来源任务上的度量。我们研究了各种度量,包括编辑距离度量和混合方法。总的来说,性能最好的度量是余弦距离,对于不同程度的相似度的输入对,会产生数量级不同的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formal Representation and Comparative Analysis of Software Runtime Process
Using a software tracing frameworks we obtain sequences of system calls produced during the execution of the pair of programs. We then transform the sequences of system calls into the symbolic sequences and apply a set of string metrics to them. We experimentally compare metrics on the task of differentiating the sources of sequences. We investigate various metrics including edit-distance metrics and hybrid methods. Overall, the best-performing metric is a cosine distance, resulting in order-of-magnitude different values for input pairs of different degrees of similarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信