法学中的认识论怀疑论与中立性。对法律批判理论的一些批判

José Luis Monti
{"title":"法学中的认识论怀疑论与中立性。对法律批判理论的一些批判","authors":"José Luis Monti","doi":"10.5935/1809-8487.20140017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author proposes to examine some issues that can arise in the field of the theory of law. To this end, taking as object of analysis certain postulates of the so-called 'critical theory of law', from the formulation of one of its most notable exponents: Duncan Kennedy. He made a critical examination of these proposals and a brief outline of a different perspective. He begins with a summary of his thesis, to then point out the objections found in its formulation, from the point of view of their logical coherence and its practical consequences.","PeriodicalId":410816,"journal":{"name":"Aequitas Virtual","volume":"271 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Escepticismo epistemológico y neutralidad en la ciencia del derecho. Algunas críticas a la teoría crítica del derecho\",\"authors\":\"José Luis Monti\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1809-8487.20140017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author proposes to examine some issues that can arise in the field of the theory of law. To this end, taking as object of analysis certain postulates of the so-called 'critical theory of law', from the formulation of one of its most notable exponents: Duncan Kennedy. He made a critical examination of these proposals and a brief outline of a different perspective. He begins with a summary of his thesis, to then point out the objections found in its formulation, from the point of view of their logical coherence and its practical consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aequitas Virtual\",\"volume\":\"271 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aequitas Virtual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1809-8487.20140017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aequitas Virtual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1809-8487.20140017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

笔者建议对法理领域可能出现的一些问题进行考察。为了达到这个目的,我们以所谓的“法律批判理论”的某些假设作为分析的对象,这些假设来自其最著名的代表之一:邓肯·肯尼迪的表述。他对这些建议进行了批判性的审查,并简要概述了不同的观点。他首先概述了他的论文,然后从逻辑一致性和实际后果的角度指出了在其表述中发现的反对意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Escepticismo epistemológico y neutralidad en la ciencia del derecho. Algunas críticas a la teoría crítica del derecho
The author proposes to examine some issues that can arise in the field of the theory of law. To this end, taking as object of analysis certain postulates of the so-called 'critical theory of law', from the formulation of one of its most notable exponents: Duncan Kennedy. He made a critical examination of these proposals and a brief outline of a different perspective. He begins with a summary of his thesis, to then point out the objections found in its formulation, from the point of view of their logical coherence and its practical consequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信