开颅术中瑞芬太尼剂量增加仍可引起运动诱发电位的一例。

T. Kunisawa, Mitsuteru Oikawa, Tamio Ito, A. Kurosawa, S. Hanada, H. Iwasaki
{"title":"开颅术中瑞芬太尼剂量增加仍可引起运动诱发电位的一例。","authors":"T. Kunisawa, Mitsuteru Oikawa, Tamio Ito, A. Kurosawa, S. Hanada, H. Iwasaki","doi":"10.5580/2cd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We performed anesthetic management for craniotomy, during which motor evoked potential (MEP) was elicited by direct motor cortex stimulation (DMS), in a female patient with brain aneurysm. Propofol and remifentanil were used for anesthetic induction and maintenance. The propofol concentration was adjusted in accordance with bispectral index value, and the remifentanil concentration was adjusted in accordance with the hemodynamic values. Although we planned to use a remifentanil dose of 0.2 �og/kg/min on the basis of a previous report, the dose had to be increased to 0.5�og/kg/min, the effect-site concentration was calculated to be 17.2 ng/mL by using a pharmacokinetic simulation, which was in accordance with the hemodynamic values. However, MEP could be well elicited throughout MEP monitoring. This finding was consistent with that of previous studies in which MEP was elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation (TCS) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Emergence from anesthesia is well, and no side effects or new neurological deficits occurred. It is thought remifentanil might have also a wide dosage window with respect to monitoring MEP elicited by DMS.","PeriodicalId":326784,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case in which motor evoked potential could be elicited despite an increase in remifentanil dose during craniotomy.\",\"authors\":\"T. Kunisawa, Mitsuteru Oikawa, Tamio Ito, A. Kurosawa, S. Hanada, H. Iwasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/2cd\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We performed anesthetic management for craniotomy, during which motor evoked potential (MEP) was elicited by direct motor cortex stimulation (DMS), in a female patient with brain aneurysm. Propofol and remifentanil were used for anesthetic induction and maintenance. The propofol concentration was adjusted in accordance with bispectral index value, and the remifentanil concentration was adjusted in accordance with the hemodynamic values. Although we planned to use a remifentanil dose of 0.2 �og/kg/min on the basis of a previous report, the dose had to be increased to 0.5�og/kg/min, the effect-site concentration was calculated to be 17.2 ng/mL by using a pharmacokinetic simulation, which was in accordance with the hemodynamic values. However, MEP could be well elicited throughout MEP monitoring. This finding was consistent with that of previous studies in which MEP was elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation (TCS) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Emergence from anesthesia is well, and no side effects or new neurological deficits occurred. It is thought remifentanil might have also a wide dosage window with respect to monitoring MEP elicited by DMS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/2cd\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2cd","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们对一名患有脑动脉瘤的女性患者进行了开颅手术的麻醉管理,在开颅手术期间,通过直接运动皮质刺激(DMS)引发了运动诱发电位(MEP)。异丙酚和瑞芬太尼用于麻醉诱导和维持。根据双谱指标值调整异丙酚浓度,根据血流动力学值调整瑞芬太尼浓度。虽然根据先前的报道,我们计划使用0.2 μ g/kg/min的瑞芬太尼剂量,但剂量必须增加到0.5 μ g/kg/min,通过药代动力学模拟计算出效应位点浓度为17.2 ng/mL,这与血流动力学值一致。然而,在整个MEP监测过程中,可以很好地激发MEP。这一发现与先前通过经颅电刺激(TCS)或经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发MEP的研究一致。麻醉后恢复良好,无副作用或出现新的神经功能缺损。人们认为瑞芬太尼在监测DMS引起的MEP方面也可能具有较宽的剂量窗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A case in which motor evoked potential could be elicited despite an increase in remifentanil dose during craniotomy.
We performed anesthetic management for craniotomy, during which motor evoked potential (MEP) was elicited by direct motor cortex stimulation (DMS), in a female patient with brain aneurysm. Propofol and remifentanil were used for anesthetic induction and maintenance. The propofol concentration was adjusted in accordance with bispectral index value, and the remifentanil concentration was adjusted in accordance with the hemodynamic values. Although we planned to use a remifentanil dose of 0.2 �og/kg/min on the basis of a previous report, the dose had to be increased to 0.5�og/kg/min, the effect-site concentration was calculated to be 17.2 ng/mL by using a pharmacokinetic simulation, which was in accordance with the hemodynamic values. However, MEP could be well elicited throughout MEP monitoring. This finding was consistent with that of previous studies in which MEP was elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation (TCS) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Emergence from anesthesia is well, and no side effects or new neurological deficits occurred. It is thought remifentanil might have also a wide dosage window with respect to monitoring MEP elicited by DMS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信