{"title":"一般弱优先级分配问题的两种竞争机制","authors":"Wataru Ishida","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3098685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a priority based allocation problem with general weak priorities. We focus on two strategy-proof mechanisms: the deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism and the top trading cycles (TTC) mechanism. We give two conditions on weak priority structures whereby each of the DA mechanism and TTC mechanism with an arbitrarily fixed tie-breaking rule is stable and efficient. Our conditions are a generalization of each of Ergin (2002) 's and Kesten (2006)'s conditions about strict priorities. Our two conditions do not imply each other, whereas it is known that Kesten's condition implies Ergin's condition. Our analysis shows that a strategy-proof selection from stable and efficient matchings can be done for a larger domain of priority structures than the domain of Ehlers and Erdil (2010).","PeriodicalId":373527,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Two Competing Mechanisms for Priority-based Allocation Problems with General Weak Priorities\",\"authors\":\"Wataru Ishida\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3098685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider a priority based allocation problem with general weak priorities. We focus on two strategy-proof mechanisms: the deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism and the top trading cycles (TTC) mechanism. We give two conditions on weak priority structures whereby each of the DA mechanism and TTC mechanism with an arbitrarily fixed tie-breaking rule is stable and efficient. Our conditions are a generalization of each of Ergin (2002) 's and Kesten (2006)'s conditions about strict priorities. Our two conditions do not imply each other, whereas it is known that Kesten's condition implies Ergin's condition. Our analysis shows that a strategy-proof selection from stable and efficient matchings can be done for a larger domain of priority structures than the domain of Ehlers and Erdil (2010).\",\"PeriodicalId\":373527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Two Competing Mechanisms for Priority-based Allocation Problems with General Weak Priorities
We consider a priority based allocation problem with general weak priorities. We focus on two strategy-proof mechanisms: the deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism and the top trading cycles (TTC) mechanism. We give two conditions on weak priority structures whereby each of the DA mechanism and TTC mechanism with an arbitrarily fixed tie-breaking rule is stable and efficient. Our conditions are a generalization of each of Ergin (2002) 's and Kesten (2006)'s conditions about strict priorities. Our two conditions do not imply each other, whereas it is known that Kesten's condition implies Ergin's condition. Our analysis shows that a strategy-proof selection from stable and efficient matchings can be done for a larger domain of priority structures than the domain of Ehlers and Erdil (2010).