罗马国际法概念的探索

Z. Jalaly
{"title":"罗马国际法概念的探索","authors":"Z. Jalaly","doi":"10.31841/kjssh.2021.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an attempt to explore the Roman notions of international law, this paper analyses the notions of jus gentium, commonly perceived as Roman International law, jus fetiale, and jus belli. It argues that although jus gentium resembles the modern private international law, it cannot be labeled as public international law. It claims that jus fetiale, which is more a ceremonial system than legal, resembles modern international law more than jus gentium. The paper concludes that the Roman empire did not observe an international law proper. Instead, it observed two sets of laws where the first set regulated relations between Romans and Romans (jus civile) while the second set dealt with relations between Romans and other individuals (jus gentium). In none of the two sets do we observe rules that regulate relations between two states, which is the primary focus of international law.","PeriodicalId":117682,"journal":{"name":"Kardan Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the Roman Notions of International Law\",\"authors\":\"Z. Jalaly\",\"doi\":\"10.31841/kjssh.2021.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an attempt to explore the Roman notions of international law, this paper analyses the notions of jus gentium, commonly perceived as Roman International law, jus fetiale, and jus belli. It argues that although jus gentium resembles the modern private international law, it cannot be labeled as public international law. It claims that jus fetiale, which is more a ceremonial system than legal, resembles modern international law more than jus gentium. The paper concludes that the Roman empire did not observe an international law proper. Instead, it observed two sets of laws where the first set regulated relations between Romans and Romans (jus civile) while the second set dealt with relations between Romans and other individuals (jus gentium). In none of the two sets do we observe rules that regulate relations between two states, which is the primary focus of international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kardan Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kardan Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31841/kjssh.2021.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardan Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31841/kjssh.2021.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了探讨罗马人的国际法概念,本文分析了“万民法”(通常被理解为罗马国际法)、“胎儿法”和“战争法”的概念。它认为,虽然万民法类似于现代国际私法,但不能被称为国际公法。它声称,相对于法律而言,“血统法”(jus fetiale)更像是一种仪式制度,更像现代国际法,而不是“血统法”(jus gentium)。这篇论文的结论是,罗马帝国并没有真正遵守国际法。相反,它遵循两套法律,第一套规范罗马人和罗马人之间的关系(民法),第二套处理罗马人和其他个人之间的关系(万民法)。在这两套规则中,我们都没有遵守规范国与国之间关系的规则,而这正是国际法的主要焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of the Roman Notions of International Law
In an attempt to explore the Roman notions of international law, this paper analyses the notions of jus gentium, commonly perceived as Roman International law, jus fetiale, and jus belli. It argues that although jus gentium resembles the modern private international law, it cannot be labeled as public international law. It claims that jus fetiale, which is more a ceremonial system than legal, resembles modern international law more than jus gentium. The paper concludes that the Roman empire did not observe an international law proper. Instead, it observed two sets of laws where the first set regulated relations between Romans and Romans (jus civile) while the second set dealt with relations between Romans and other individuals (jus gentium). In none of the two sets do we observe rules that regulate relations between two states, which is the primary focus of international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信