{"title":"人工小切口白内障手术中腱突麻醉与球周麻醉的比较研究","authors":"H. Kumar, Kavita Patil","doi":"10.16965/IJIMS.2019.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results: 56% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 32% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no pain, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.048), 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004), and 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004).","PeriodicalId":105328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A STUDY OF COMPARISON OF SUBTENON’S ANAESTHESIA WITH PERIBULBAR ANAESTHESIA IN MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY IN RIMS TEACHING HOSPITAL RAICHUR\",\"authors\":\"H. Kumar, Kavita Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.16965/IJIMS.2019.111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Results: 56% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 32% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no pain, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.048), 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004), and 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004).\",\"PeriodicalId\":105328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16965/IJIMS.2019.111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16965/IJIMS.2019.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A STUDY OF COMPARISON OF SUBTENON’S ANAESTHESIA WITH PERIBULBAR ANAESTHESIA IN MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY IN RIMS TEACHING HOSPITAL RAICHUR
Results: 56% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 32% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no pain, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.048), 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004), and 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
