故事比较:来自电影评论的证据

Bernhard Fisseni, Aadil Kurji, Deniz Sarikaya, Mira Viehstädt
{"title":"故事比较:来自电影评论的证据","authors":"Bernhard Fisseni, Aadil Kurji, Deniz Sarikaya, Mira Viehstädt","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interested in formally modelling similarity between narratives, we \ninvestigate judgements of similarity between narratives in a small \ncorpus of film reviews and book–film comparisons. A main finding is \nthat judgements tend to concern multiple levels of story \nrepresentation at once. As these texts are pragmatically related to \nreception contexts, we find many references to reception quality and \noptimality. We conclude that current formal models of narrative can \nnot capture the task of naturalistic narrative comparisons given in \nthe analysed reviews, but that the development of models containing a \nmore reception-oriented point of view will be necessary.","PeriodicalId":311534,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Story Comparisons: Evidence from Film Reviews\",\"authors\":\"Bernhard Fisseni, Aadil Kurji, Deniz Sarikaya, Mira Viehstädt\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interested in formally modelling similarity between narratives, we \\ninvestigate judgements of similarity between narratives in a small \\ncorpus of film reviews and book–film comparisons. A main finding is \\nthat judgements tend to concern multiple levels of story \\nrepresentation at once. As these texts are pragmatically related to \\nreception contexts, we find many references to reception quality and \\noptimality. We conclude that current formal models of narrative can \\nnot capture the task of naturalistic narrative comparisons given in \\nthe analysed reviews, but that the development of models containing a \\nmore reception-oriented point of view will be necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们对叙事之间的相似性进行了形式化建模,研究了一小部分电影评论和书-电影比较中叙事之间的相似性判断。一个主要的发现是,判断倾向于同时关注故事的多个层面。由于这些文本在语用上与接收语境相关,我们发现许多关于接收质量和最优性的文献。我们得出的结论是,目前的正式叙事模型无法捕捉到所分析的评论中给出的自然主义叙事比较的任务,但包含更多接受导向观点的模型的发展将是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Story Comparisons: Evidence from Film Reviews
Interested in formally modelling similarity between narratives, we investigate judgements of similarity between narratives in a small corpus of film reviews and book–film comparisons. A main finding is that judgements tend to concern multiple levels of story representation at once. As these texts are pragmatically related to reception contexts, we find many references to reception quality and optimality. We conclude that current formal models of narrative can not capture the task of naturalistic narrative comparisons given in the analysed reviews, but that the development of models containing a more reception-oriented point of view will be necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信