作为网络标准的法律

D. Burk
{"title":"作为网络标准的法律","authors":"D. Burk","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/nprxh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of global information flows via computer networks can be conceived and understood as raising issues of competition, interoperability, and standard-setting parallel to those in analysis of technical standards. Uniform standards, whether technical or legal, give rise to a constellation of positive and negative network effects. As a global network based upon the \"end to end\" principle of interoperability, the Internet mediates between different, otherwise incompatible computing platforms. But to the extent that law and technological \"code\" may act as substitutes in shaping human behavior, the Internet similarly mediates between different, otherwise incompatible legal platforms. Much of the legal and social controversy surrounding the Internet stems from the interconnection of such incompatible legal systems. As with technical systems, problems of incompatibility may be addressed by the adoption of uniform legal standards. This, however, raises legal standard-setting problems similar to those seen in technical standard-setting, where the standard may be \"tipped\" in favor of dominant producers. In particular, if law is considered a social product, the benefits of interjurisdictional competition and diversity may be lost as a single uniform legal standard dominates the market for law.","PeriodicalId":385021,"journal":{"name":"Yale Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law as a Network Standard\",\"authors\":\"D. Burk\",\"doi\":\"10.31235/osf.io/nprxh\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of global information flows via computer networks can be conceived and understood as raising issues of competition, interoperability, and standard-setting parallel to those in analysis of technical standards. Uniform standards, whether technical or legal, give rise to a constellation of positive and negative network effects. As a global network based upon the \\\"end to end\\\" principle of interoperability, the Internet mediates between different, otherwise incompatible computing platforms. But to the extent that law and technological \\\"code\\\" may act as substitutes in shaping human behavior, the Internet similarly mediates between different, otherwise incompatible legal platforms. Much of the legal and social controversy surrounding the Internet stems from the interconnection of such incompatible legal systems. As with technical systems, problems of incompatibility may be addressed by the adoption of uniform legal standards. This, however, raises legal standard-setting problems similar to those seen in technical standard-setting, where the standard may be \\\"tipped\\\" in favor of dominant producers. In particular, if law is considered a social product, the benefits of interjurisdictional competition and diversity may be lost as a single uniform legal standard dominates the market for law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yale Journal of Law and Technology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yale Journal of Law and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nprxh\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nprxh","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

通过计算机网络的全球信息流动问题可以被理解为提出了与分析技术标准平行的竞争、互操作性和标准制定问题。统一的标准,无论是技术上的还是法律上的,都会产生一系列积极和消极的网络效应。作为一个基于“端到端”互操作性原则的全球网络,互联网在不同的、不兼容的计算平台之间进行调解。但在某种程度上,法律和技术“代码”可能在塑造人类行为方面起到替代作用,互联网同样在不同的、不相容的法律平台之间起到调解作用。围绕互联网的许多法律和社会争议源于这些不相容的法律体系的相互联系。与技术制度一样,不相容的问题可以通过采用统一的法律标准来解决。然而,这引起了法律标准制定方面的问题,类似于在技术标准制定方面看到的问题,在技术标准制定方面,标准可能“倾向”有利于占主导地位的生产商。特别是,如果法律被视为一种社会产品,那么由于单一统一的法律标准支配着法律市场,司法管辖区间竞争和多样性的好处可能会丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law as a Network Standard
The problem of global information flows via computer networks can be conceived and understood as raising issues of competition, interoperability, and standard-setting parallel to those in analysis of technical standards. Uniform standards, whether technical or legal, give rise to a constellation of positive and negative network effects. As a global network based upon the "end to end" principle of interoperability, the Internet mediates between different, otherwise incompatible computing platforms. But to the extent that law and technological "code" may act as substitutes in shaping human behavior, the Internet similarly mediates between different, otherwise incompatible legal platforms. Much of the legal and social controversy surrounding the Internet stems from the interconnection of such incompatible legal systems. As with technical systems, problems of incompatibility may be addressed by the adoption of uniform legal standards. This, however, raises legal standard-setting problems similar to those seen in technical standard-setting, where the standard may be "tipped" in favor of dominant producers. In particular, if law is considered a social product, the benefits of interjurisdictional competition and diversity may be lost as a single uniform legal standard dominates the market for law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信