量化常规脑电图记录和用定量脑电图检查其输出计算

Gregory Xavier, Anselm Su Ting, Norsiah Fauzan
{"title":"量化常规脑电图记录和用定量脑电图检查其输出计算","authors":"Gregory Xavier, Anselm Su Ting, Norsiah Fauzan","doi":"10.33736/jcshd.3656.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative electroencephalogram enables mathematical analysis of neurological recordings while conventional electroencephalogram lacks the mathematical output; hence, its usage is limited to neurological experts. This study was to determine if quantified conventional electroencephalogram recordings were compatible and comparable with quantitative electroencephalogram recordings. A group of post-call doctors was recruited and subjected to an EEG recording using a conventional electroencephalogram followed by a quantitative electroencephalogram device. The patterns and quantified recording results were compared. A comparative analysis of the two recording sets did not find differences in the recording patterns and statistical analysis. The findings promoted the use of a readily available conventional electroencephalogram in quantitative brain wave studies and have cleared potential compatibility bias towards data merging.","PeriodicalId":170307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Conventional Electroencephalogram Recordings and Examining its Output Computation with a Quantitative Electroencephalogram\",\"authors\":\"Gregory Xavier, Anselm Su Ting, Norsiah Fauzan\",\"doi\":\"10.33736/jcshd.3656.2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantitative electroencephalogram enables mathematical analysis of neurological recordings while conventional electroencephalogram lacks the mathematical output; hence, its usage is limited to neurological experts. This study was to determine if quantified conventional electroencephalogram recordings were compatible and comparable with quantitative electroencephalogram recordings. A group of post-call doctors was recruited and subjected to an EEG recording using a conventional electroencephalogram followed by a quantitative electroencephalogram device. The patterns and quantified recording results were compared. A comparative analysis of the two recording sets did not find differences in the recording patterns and statistical analysis. The findings promoted the use of a readily available conventional electroencephalogram in quantitative brain wave studies and have cleared potential compatibility bias towards data merging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.3656.2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.3656.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量脑电图能够对神经记录进行数学分析,而传统脑电图缺乏数学输出;因此,它的使用仅限于神经学专家。本研究旨在确定定量常规脑电图记录是否与定量脑电图记录兼容并具有可比性。招募了一组门诊医生,并使用常规脑电图和定量脑电图设备进行脑电图记录。并将其模式与定量记录结果进行比较。对两个记录集的比较分析没有发现记录模式和统计分析的差异。这些发现促进了在定量脑电波研究中使用现成的传统脑电图,并清除了数据合并的潜在兼容性偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Conventional Electroencephalogram Recordings and Examining its Output Computation with a Quantitative Electroencephalogram
Quantitative electroencephalogram enables mathematical analysis of neurological recordings while conventional electroencephalogram lacks the mathematical output; hence, its usage is limited to neurological experts. This study was to determine if quantified conventional electroencephalogram recordings were compatible and comparable with quantitative electroencephalogram recordings. A group of post-call doctors was recruited and subjected to an EEG recording using a conventional electroencephalogram followed by a quantitative electroencephalogram device. The patterns and quantified recording results were compared. A comparative analysis of the two recording sets did not find differences in the recording patterns and statistical analysis. The findings promoted the use of a readily available conventional electroencephalogram in quantitative brain wave studies and have cleared potential compatibility bias towards data merging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信