自卫安全软件

J. E. Kerivan, K. Brothers
{"title":"自卫安全软件","authors":"J. E. Kerivan, K. Brothers","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1606134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a series of tests designed to attack security software in real time as it provides protection for applications and operating system programs on Microsoft Windows 2000 operating platforms. One security program tested fell into the Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) category of security software. A second security solution provided Anti-Viral protection and the third security program provided Anti-Malware protection for the test systems with a principal focus on Spyware and Adware detection and removal. All security programs were run in a variety of conditions including single mode, where only the security application was running through full integration modes where all security applications were running simultaneously. Security program default configurations were used in all tests. The findings indicate that none of the tested software was capable of defending itself against attacks designed to suspend and unload them from memory. As is shown, the IPS software was more robust than the other two solutions, but was easily compromised and actually created numerous false positives and misinformed the user on the running of the other security software.","PeriodicalId":223742,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-defending security software\",\"authors\":\"J. E. Kerivan, K. Brothers\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1606134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes a series of tests designed to attack security software in real time as it provides protection for applications and operating system programs on Microsoft Windows 2000 operating platforms. One security program tested fell into the Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) category of security software. A second security solution provided Anti-Viral protection and the third security program provided Anti-Malware protection for the test systems with a principal focus on Spyware and Adware detection and removal. All security programs were run in a variety of conditions including single mode, where only the security application was running through full integration modes where all security applications were running simultaneously. Security program default configurations were used in all tests. The findings indicate that none of the tested software was capable of defending itself against attacks designed to suspend and unload them from memory. As is shown, the IPS software was more robust than the other two solutions, but was easily compromised and actually created numerous false positives and misinformed the user on the running of the other security software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"volume\":\"181 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1606134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1606134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文介绍了针对Microsoft Windows 2000操作平台上的应用程序和操作系统程序提供保护的一系列实时攻击安全软件的测试。测试的一个安全程序属于入侵防御系统(IPS)一类的安全软件。第二个安全解决方案提供反病毒保护,第三个安全程序为测试系统提供反恶意软件保护,主要侧重于间谍软件和广告软件的检测和删除。所有安全程序都在各种条件下运行,包括单一模式,其中只有安全应用程序运行,以及所有安全应用程序同时运行的完全集成模式。所有测试都使用安全程序的默认配置。调查结果表明,没有一款被测试的软件能够抵御旨在将它们从内存中挂起和卸载的攻击。如图所示,IPS软件比其他两种解决方案更健壮,但很容易被攻破,实际上产生了许多误报,并误导用户运行其他安全软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-defending security software
This paper describes a series of tests designed to attack security software in real time as it provides protection for applications and operating system programs on Microsoft Windows 2000 operating platforms. One security program tested fell into the Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) category of security software. A second security solution provided Anti-Viral protection and the third security program provided Anti-Malware protection for the test systems with a principal focus on Spyware and Adware detection and removal. All security programs were run in a variety of conditions including single mode, where only the security application was running through full integration modes where all security applications were running simultaneously. Security program default configurations were used in all tests. The findings indicate that none of the tested software was capable of defending itself against attacks designed to suspend and unload them from memory. As is shown, the IPS software was more robust than the other two solutions, but was easily compromised and actually created numerous false positives and misinformed the user on the running of the other security software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信