{"title":"圣玛丽亚天主教大学学生学术压力量表(ECEA)的心理测量分析","authors":"Tania Malu Chavez Anaya, Maria Mercedes Cuadros Rivera, Araceli Lopez Maque, Maria Fernanda Montoya Zea, Nikolle Requena Esquieros, Yomira Talavera Aliga","doi":"10.33539/AVPSICOL.2019V27N1.1467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to determine the validity and reliability of the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) developed by Cabanach et al. (2016). To this end, this scale was applied to a sample of 150 university students (38 men and 112 women) of the Catholic University of Santa Maria with an age range of 16 to 32 years. To determine the criterion validity, first, item-scale correlations were performed, obtaining correlation coefficients that are between .429 and .697. The validity of the construct was assessed by exploratory factor analysis with the maximum likelihood method, obtaining a KMO value of .874. By means of the direct Oblimin rotation technique, 12 factors were found, of which, when doing the second factorization, only two factorswere left, which did not confirm the structure of the test proposed by Cabanach et al. However, the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) has adequate psychometric properties that make it possible to recommend its use as an instrument for assessing academic stress.","PeriodicalId":273778,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Psicología","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis psicométrico de la escala de estresores academicos (ECEA), en estudiantes de la Universidad Catolica de Santa Maria\",\"authors\":\"Tania Malu Chavez Anaya, Maria Mercedes Cuadros Rivera, Araceli Lopez Maque, Maria Fernanda Montoya Zea, Nikolle Requena Esquieros, Yomira Talavera Aliga\",\"doi\":\"10.33539/AVPSICOL.2019V27N1.1467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research is to determine the validity and reliability of the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) developed by Cabanach et al. (2016). To this end, this scale was applied to a sample of 150 university students (38 men and 112 women) of the Catholic University of Santa Maria with an age range of 16 to 32 years. To determine the criterion validity, first, item-scale correlations were performed, obtaining correlation coefficients that are between .429 and .697. The validity of the construct was assessed by exploratory factor analysis with the maximum likelihood method, obtaining a KMO value of .874. By means of the direct Oblimin rotation technique, 12 factors were found, of which, when doing the second factorization, only two factorswere left, which did not confirm the structure of the test proposed by Cabanach et al. However, the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) has adequate psychometric properties that make it possible to recommend its use as an instrument for assessing academic stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avances en Psicología\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avances en Psicología\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33539/AVPSICOL.2019V27N1.1467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Psicología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33539/AVPSICOL.2019V27N1.1467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究的目的是确定Cabanach et al.(2016)开发的学术压力源量表(ECEA)的效度和信度。为此,本量表应用于圣玛丽亚天主教大学的150名大学生(38名男性,112名女性),年龄在16岁至32岁之间。为了确定标准的效度,首先进行了项目量表的相关分析,得到了0.429到0.697之间的相关系数。运用最大似然法进行探索性因子分析,得到的KMO值为0.874。通过直接Oblimin旋转技术,发现了12个因子,其中,在做第二次因子分解时,只剩下两个因子,这并没有证实Cabanach等人提出的检验结构。然而,学业压力源量表(ECEA)具有足够的心理测量特性,可以推荐使用它作为评估学业压力的工具。
Análisis psicométrico de la escala de estresores academicos (ECEA), en estudiantes de la Universidad Catolica de Santa Maria
The purpose of this research is to determine the validity and reliability of the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) developed by Cabanach et al. (2016). To this end, this scale was applied to a sample of 150 university students (38 men and 112 women) of the Catholic University of Santa Maria with an age range of 16 to 32 years. To determine the criterion validity, first, item-scale correlations were performed, obtaining correlation coefficients that are between .429 and .697. The validity of the construct was assessed by exploratory factor analysis with the maximum likelihood method, obtaining a KMO value of .874. By means of the direct Oblimin rotation technique, 12 factors were found, of which, when doing the second factorization, only two factorswere left, which did not confirm the structure of the test proposed by Cabanach et al. However, the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) has adequate psychometric properties that make it possible to recommend its use as an instrument for assessing academic stress.