在三家伊斯兰企业的合并中,垄断企业的例外关系

C. M. Alit, Yeti Sumiyati
{"title":"在三家伊斯兰企业的合并中,垄断企业的例外关系","authors":"C. M. Alit, Yeti Sumiyati","doi":"10.28932/di.v13i1.3618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the following issues: first, whether the merger of 3 state-owned sharia banks is included in the criteria for monopolistic practice as an activity prohibited in the Law on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. Second, what is the relevance of the provisions of the exclusion of monopolistic practices on BUMN in the Law on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition to the merger of 3 BUMN sharia banks. This study uses a normative juridical method. The results showed that the merger or merger of 3 state-owned sharia banks could potentially lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition as prohibited by Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.","PeriodicalId":246508,"journal":{"name":"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RELEVANSI PENGECUALIAN PRAKTIK MONOPOLI TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN BUMN DALAM MERGER TIGA BANK SYARIAH BUMN\",\"authors\":\"C. M. Alit, Yeti Sumiyati\",\"doi\":\"10.28932/di.v13i1.3618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the following issues: first, whether the merger of 3 state-owned sharia banks is included in the criteria for monopolistic practice as an activity prohibited in the Law on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. Second, what is the relevance of the provisions of the exclusion of monopolistic practices on BUMN in the Law on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition to the merger of 3 BUMN sharia banks. This study uses a normative juridical method. The results showed that the merger or merger of 3 state-owned sharia banks could potentially lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition as prohibited by Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i1.3618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i1.3618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究考察了以下问题:第一,三家国有伊斯兰银行的合并是否作为《垄断行为和不正当商业竞争法》所禁止的活动被纳入垄断行为的标准。第二,《反垄断行为和不正当商业竞争法》中对伊斯兰银行排除垄断行为的规定与3家伊斯兰银行合并的相关性是什么?本研究采用规范的司法方法。结果表明,3家国有伊斯兰银行的合并或合并可能导致1999年《禁止垄断行为和不正当商业竞争》第5号法所禁止的垄断行为和不正当商业竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RELEVANSI PENGECUALIAN PRAKTIK MONOPOLI TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN BUMN DALAM MERGER TIGA BANK SYARIAH BUMN
This study examines the following issues: first, whether the merger of 3 state-owned sharia banks is included in the criteria for monopolistic practice as an activity prohibited in the Law on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. Second, what is the relevance of the provisions of the exclusion of monopolistic practices on BUMN in the Law on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition to the merger of 3 BUMN sharia banks. This study uses a normative juridical method. The results showed that the merger or merger of 3 state-owned sharia banks could potentially lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition as prohibited by Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信