自适应周期时间和周期需求比例算法的交错轮询比较

S. Krijestorac, J. Bagby
{"title":"自适应周期时间和周期需求比例算法的交错轮询比较","authors":"S. Krijestorac, J. Bagby","doi":"10.1109/ISSPIT.2008.4775646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethernet passive optical network (EPON) is an access network that delivers essential services of voice, video, and data communications reliably, while at the same time providing expected guarantees of the delivery of those services in terms of defined quality of service measures (QOS). This paper compares performance criteria such as delay, queue size, and packet loss ratio for two dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) algorithms: interleaved polling with adaptive cycle time (IPACT), and a new cyclic demand proportionality algorithm (CDP). CDP gives the best performances in terms delay vs. offered load, queue size vs. offered load and packet loss ratio vs. offered load compared to IPACT with the Fixed Allocation Window size for transmission. Improvement is seen for these three parameters when CDP is compared with IPACT with limited allocation window size. A traffic generator that gives traffic with self-similar and long range dependency properties is used in the simulations.","PeriodicalId":213756,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Interleaved Polling with adaptive Cycle Time and Cyclic Demand Proportionality Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"S. Krijestorac, J. Bagby\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSPIT.2008.4775646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ethernet passive optical network (EPON) is an access network that delivers essential services of voice, video, and data communications reliably, while at the same time providing expected guarantees of the delivery of those services in terms of defined quality of service measures (QOS). This paper compares performance criteria such as delay, queue size, and packet loss ratio for two dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) algorithms: interleaved polling with adaptive cycle time (IPACT), and a new cyclic demand proportionality algorithm (CDP). CDP gives the best performances in terms delay vs. offered load, queue size vs. offered load and packet loss ratio vs. offered load compared to IPACT with the Fixed Allocation Window size for transmission. Improvement is seen for these three parameters when CDP is compared with IPACT with limited allocation window size. A traffic generator that gives traffic with self-similar and long range dependency properties is used in the simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPIT.2008.4775646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPIT.2008.4775646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

以太网无源光网络(EPON)是一种可靠地提供语音、视频和数据通信基本业务的接入网,同时根据已定义的服务质量度量(QOS)为这些业务的交付提供预期的保证。本文比较了两种动态带宽分配(DBA)算法:具有自适应周期时间的交错轮询算法(IPACT)和一种新的循环需求比例算法(CDP)的延迟、队列大小和丢包率等性能标准。与具有传输固定分配窗口大小的IPACT相比,CDP在延迟与提供的负载、队列大小与提供的负载以及丢包率与提供的负载方面提供了最佳性能。当CDP与分配窗口大小有限的IPACT相比,这三个参数有所改善。在仿真中使用了一个流量生成器,使流量具有自相似和远程依赖特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Interleaved Polling with adaptive Cycle Time and Cyclic Demand Proportionality Algorithms
Ethernet passive optical network (EPON) is an access network that delivers essential services of voice, video, and data communications reliably, while at the same time providing expected guarantees of the delivery of those services in terms of defined quality of service measures (QOS). This paper compares performance criteria such as delay, queue size, and packet loss ratio for two dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) algorithms: interleaved polling with adaptive cycle time (IPACT), and a new cyclic demand proportionality algorithm (CDP). CDP gives the best performances in terms delay vs. offered load, queue size vs. offered load and packet loss ratio vs. offered load compared to IPACT with the Fixed Allocation Window size for transmission. Improvement is seen for these three parameters when CDP is compared with IPACT with limited allocation window size. A traffic generator that gives traffic with self-similar and long range dependency properties is used in the simulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信