使用短篇故事对八年级伊斯兰学校学生阅读能力的影响

L. Amalia
{"title":"使用短篇故事对八年级伊斯兰学校学生阅读能力的影响","authors":"L. Amalia","doi":"10.47080/jeltl.v2i1.542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Method of the research used quantitative research by using quasi experimental design.has both pre and posttests and experimental and control groups, but no random assignment of subjects. To collect the data, the writer used pre-test and post-test. Pre-test given to students before treatment. Post-test is a test that given to students after treatment. After collecting the data, the writer qualifies it based on its kind. To analyze data, the writer uses twoapproaches. To compare the result of research between experimental class and control class.From the calculation of data, the writer got the result as follow:  from control class: (1) Mean score of pre-test (My1) 61,8 and post-test score (My2) 72,0. It means that average score of control class got increase 10,2. Whereas mean score from experimental class for pre-test (Mx1) 57,9 and post-testscore (Mx2) 78,3. It means that average score from experimental class got increase 20,4 and it got higher increase than from control class. (2) The percentage from control class is 34% and experimental class is 67%, so both average and percentage score both of control class and experimental class got increase but control class got relatively little increase than experimental class. (3) “t” observation is 6,41 and 70. \n ","PeriodicalId":180232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature (JELTL)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE INFLUENCE OF USING SHORT STORY TOWARD READING ABILITY AT THE EIGHT GRADE MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH NURUL HUDA, BAROS-SERANG\",\"authors\":\"L. Amalia\",\"doi\":\"10.47080/jeltl.v2i1.542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Method of the research used quantitative research by using quasi experimental design.has both pre and posttests and experimental and control groups, but no random assignment of subjects. To collect the data, the writer used pre-test and post-test. Pre-test given to students before treatment. Post-test is a test that given to students after treatment. After collecting the data, the writer qualifies it based on its kind. To analyze data, the writer uses twoapproaches. To compare the result of research between experimental class and control class.From the calculation of data, the writer got the result as follow:  from control class: (1) Mean score of pre-test (My1) 61,8 and post-test score (My2) 72,0. It means that average score of control class got increase 10,2. Whereas mean score from experimental class for pre-test (Mx1) 57,9 and post-testscore (Mx2) 78,3. It means that average score from experimental class got increase 20,4 and it got higher increase than from control class. (2) The percentage from control class is 34% and experimental class is 67%, so both average and percentage score both of control class and experimental class got increase but control class got relatively little increase than experimental class. (3) “t” observation is 6,41 and 70. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":180232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature (JELTL)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature (JELTL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47080/jeltl.v2i1.542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature (JELTL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47080/jeltl.v2i1.542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用准实验设计的定量研究方法。有前测和后测,实验组和对照组,但没有随机分配的受试者。为了收集数据,作者采用了前测和后测两种方法。治疗前对学生进行预测试。后测试是在治疗后对学生进行的测试。收集数据后,作者根据其类型对其进行限定。为了分析数据,作者使用了两种方法。比较实验班与对照班的研究结果。通过对数据的计算,笔者得到如下结果:控制类:(1)前测(My1)均分61,8分,后测(My2)均分72,0分。这意味着对照组的平均分提高了10.2分。而实验班的前测平均分(Mx1)为57,9,后测平均分(Mx2)为78,3。这意味着实验班的平均分提高了20.4分,比对照组的平均分提高得更高。(2)控制班的百分比为34%,实验班的百分比为67%,因此控制班和实验班的平均分和百分比分数都有所提高,但控制班比实验班的提高相对较小。(3)“t”观测值为6、41和70。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE INFLUENCE OF USING SHORT STORY TOWARD READING ABILITY AT THE EIGHT GRADE MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH NURUL HUDA, BAROS-SERANG
Method of the research used quantitative research by using quasi experimental design.has both pre and posttests and experimental and control groups, but no random assignment of subjects. To collect the data, the writer used pre-test and post-test. Pre-test given to students before treatment. Post-test is a test that given to students after treatment. After collecting the data, the writer qualifies it based on its kind. To analyze data, the writer uses twoapproaches. To compare the result of research between experimental class and control class.From the calculation of data, the writer got the result as follow:  from control class: (1) Mean score of pre-test (My1) 61,8 and post-test score (My2) 72,0. It means that average score of control class got increase 10,2. Whereas mean score from experimental class for pre-test (Mx1) 57,9 and post-testscore (Mx2) 78,3. It means that average score from experimental class got increase 20,4 and it got higher increase than from control class. (2) The percentage from control class is 34% and experimental class is 67%, so both average and percentage score both of control class and experimental class got increase but control class got relatively little increase than experimental class. (3) “t” observation is 6,41 and 70.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信