两种混合生产计划与控制系统的仿真:比较分析

M. Bertolini, Giovanni Romagnoli, F. Zammori
{"title":"两种混合生产计划与控制系统的仿真:比较分析","authors":"M. Bertolini, Giovanni Romagnoli, F. Zammori","doi":"10.1109/IESM.2015.7380187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to analyze and compare the performances of two Hybrid Production Planning and Control (HPPCs) systems, namely CONWIP and Workload Control. Although several implementations of HPPCs reported excellent results, in fact, many authors have discharged the concept, arguing that these systems can only reduce manufacturing lead times and control WIP to the detriment of production rate, punctuality or service level. The paper starts from a brief review of the literature on HPPCs. Afterwards, the paper uses a common simulation model from the literature to compare two simple and easy-to-implement configurations of CONWIP and Workload Control against the baseline of a classic push system. The results of the simulations lead to important conclusions and suggest interesting improvements of simulation models and future directions of research for better understanding HPPCs.","PeriodicalId":308675,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation of two hybrid production planning and control systems: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Bertolini, Giovanni Romagnoli, F. Zammori\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IESM.2015.7380187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this paper is to analyze and compare the performances of two Hybrid Production Planning and Control (HPPCs) systems, namely CONWIP and Workload Control. Although several implementations of HPPCs reported excellent results, in fact, many authors have discharged the concept, arguing that these systems can only reduce manufacturing lead times and control WIP to the detriment of production rate, punctuality or service level. The paper starts from a brief review of the literature on HPPCs. Afterwards, the paper uses a common simulation model from the literature to compare two simple and easy-to-implement configurations of CONWIP and Workload Control against the baseline of a classic push system. The results of the simulations lead to important conclusions and suggest interesting improvements of simulation models and future directions of research for better understanding HPPCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM.2015.7380187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM.2015.7380187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文的目的是分析和比较两种混合生产计划和控制(HPPCs)系统的性能,即CONWIP和工作量控制。虽然HPPCs的一些实施报告了良好的效果,但实际上,许多作者已经放弃了这一概念,认为这些系统只能减少制造交货时间和控制在制品,而不利于生产率、准时性或服务水平。本文首先简要回顾了有关HPPCs的文献。然后,本文使用文献中常见的仿真模型,将CONWIP和Workload Control两种简单且易于实现的配置与经典推送系统的基线进行比较。模拟结果得出了重要的结论,并为更好地理解HPPCs提出了有趣的模拟模型改进和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation of two hybrid production planning and control systems: A comparative analysis
The goal of this paper is to analyze and compare the performances of two Hybrid Production Planning and Control (HPPCs) systems, namely CONWIP and Workload Control. Although several implementations of HPPCs reported excellent results, in fact, many authors have discharged the concept, arguing that these systems can only reduce manufacturing lead times and control WIP to the detriment of production rate, punctuality or service level. The paper starts from a brief review of the literature on HPPCs. Afterwards, the paper uses a common simulation model from the literature to compare two simple and easy-to-implement configurations of CONWIP and Workload Control against the baseline of a classic push system. The results of the simulations lead to important conclusions and suggest interesting improvements of simulation models and future directions of research for better understanding HPPCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信