亚太自由贸易协定:新一代社会层面的劳工条款?

Ronald C. Brown
{"title":"亚太自由贸易协定:新一代社会层面的劳工条款?","authors":"Ronald C. Brown","doi":"10.18060/7909.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FTAs in Asia-Pacific: “Next Generation” of Social Dimension Provisions on Labor? Recent years have brought a proliferation of Free Trade Agreements (“FTA”), bilateral and multilateral, often regional, with even larger ones being negotiated, such as the European Union (“EU”) and United States (“U.S.”) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the Transpacific Partnership (TPP). The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (“APEC”) forum members recently discussed plans to “phase out regional free trade agreements” (or supplement them) in favor of creating a singular Free Trade Agreement Asia Pacific (“FTAAP”), covering much of the Asia Pacific Region. While inter-Asian business grows and FTAs flourish in and with Asia, the inclusion of social dimension provisions in FTAs or Bilateral Investment Treaties (“BIT”) is practically non-existent, except where the Western influence appears to dominate, and social dimension provisions are included, such as in FTAs with South Korea and with Singapore. The thesis of this paper is straightforward; there are workers throughout the world, particularly in developing countries, who are subjected to substandard labor standards, and their countries are targeted for investment because of their countries’ low wages or lax enforcement of labor laws. The existence of domestic labor laws and ratification of ILO Core Labor Conventions do not necessarily provide labor protection for the workers. Likewise, international treaty obligations under FTAs with social dimension provisions on labor do not necessarily bring labor protections. There are a number of emerging FTAs in the Pacific Region and the several very significant ones on the cusps of conclusion are discussed below so as to evaluate current approaches of labor protections by FTAs. This paper proposes the “new generation” of FTA social dimension provisions should embrace a marriage of international obligations, which incorporate mandates for private contractual remedies under International Framework agreements (“IFA”), CSRs, and Codes of Conduct, with the private obligations contractually enforceable by private parties.","PeriodicalId":132559,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Asia/South East Asia (Topic)","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FTAs in Asia-Pacific: 'Next Generation' of Social Dimension Provisions on Labor?\",\"authors\":\"Ronald C. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/7909.0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"FTAs in Asia-Pacific: “Next Generation” of Social Dimension Provisions on Labor? Recent years have brought a proliferation of Free Trade Agreements (“FTA”), bilateral and multilateral, often regional, with even larger ones being negotiated, such as the European Union (“EU”) and United States (“U.S.”) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the Transpacific Partnership (TPP). The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (“APEC”) forum members recently discussed plans to “phase out regional free trade agreements” (or supplement them) in favor of creating a singular Free Trade Agreement Asia Pacific (“FTAAP”), covering much of the Asia Pacific Region. While inter-Asian business grows and FTAs flourish in and with Asia, the inclusion of social dimension provisions in FTAs or Bilateral Investment Treaties (“BIT”) is practically non-existent, except where the Western influence appears to dominate, and social dimension provisions are included, such as in FTAs with South Korea and with Singapore. The thesis of this paper is straightforward; there are workers throughout the world, particularly in developing countries, who are subjected to substandard labor standards, and their countries are targeted for investment because of their countries’ low wages or lax enforcement of labor laws. The existence of domestic labor laws and ratification of ILO Core Labor Conventions do not necessarily provide labor protection for the workers. Likewise, international treaty obligations under FTAs with social dimension provisions on labor do not necessarily bring labor protections. There are a number of emerging FTAs in the Pacific Region and the several very significant ones on the cusps of conclusion are discussed below so as to evaluate current approaches of labor protections by FTAs. This paper proposes the “new generation” of FTA social dimension provisions should embrace a marriage of international obligations, which incorporate mandates for private contractual remedies under International Framework agreements (“IFA”), CSRs, and Codes of Conduct, with the private obligations contractually enforceable by private parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Asia/South East Asia (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Asia/South East Asia (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/7909.0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Asia/South East Asia (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/7909.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

亚太自贸协定:劳工社会维度条款的“下一代”?近年来,双边和多边自由贸易协定(FTA)激增,通常是区域性的,甚至更大的自由贸易协定正在谈判中,如欧盟(EU)和美国(U.S.)跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴关系协定(TTIP)和跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPP)。亚太经济合作组织(“APEC”)论坛成员最近讨论了“逐步取消区域自由贸易协定”(或对其进行补充),以建立一个涵盖亚太大部分地区的单一亚太自由贸易协定(“FTAAP”)的计划。虽然亚洲之间的商业增长,自由贸易协定在亚洲蓬勃发展,但在自由贸易协定或双边投资协定(“BIT”)中纳入社会层面条款实际上是不存在的,除非西方的影响似乎占主导地位,并包括社会层面条款,例如与韩国和新加坡的自由贸易协定。本文的论题简单明了;世界各地,特别是发展中国家,都有工人受到不符合标准的劳动标准的约束,他们的国家由于工资低或劳动法执行不力而成为投资的目标。国内劳动法的存在和国际劳工组织核心劳工公约的批准并不一定能为工人提供劳动保护。同样,包含社会层面劳工条款的自由贸易协定下的国际条约义务也不一定带来劳工保护。太平洋地区有许多新兴的自由贸易协定,下面将讨论即将达成的几个非常重要的自由贸易协定,以评估目前自由贸易协定的劳动保护方法。本文提出,“新一代”自由贸易协定的社会维度条款应包含国际义务的结合,其中包括国际框架协议(IFA)下的私人合同救济授权、企业社会责任和行为准则,以及私人各方在合同上可执行的私人义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FTAs in Asia-Pacific: 'Next Generation' of Social Dimension Provisions on Labor?
FTAs in Asia-Pacific: “Next Generation” of Social Dimension Provisions on Labor? Recent years have brought a proliferation of Free Trade Agreements (“FTA”), bilateral and multilateral, often regional, with even larger ones being negotiated, such as the European Union (“EU”) and United States (“U.S.”) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the Transpacific Partnership (TPP). The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (“APEC”) forum members recently discussed plans to “phase out regional free trade agreements” (or supplement them) in favor of creating a singular Free Trade Agreement Asia Pacific (“FTAAP”), covering much of the Asia Pacific Region. While inter-Asian business grows and FTAs flourish in and with Asia, the inclusion of social dimension provisions in FTAs or Bilateral Investment Treaties (“BIT”) is practically non-existent, except where the Western influence appears to dominate, and social dimension provisions are included, such as in FTAs with South Korea and with Singapore. The thesis of this paper is straightforward; there are workers throughout the world, particularly in developing countries, who are subjected to substandard labor standards, and their countries are targeted for investment because of their countries’ low wages or lax enforcement of labor laws. The existence of domestic labor laws and ratification of ILO Core Labor Conventions do not necessarily provide labor protection for the workers. Likewise, international treaty obligations under FTAs with social dimension provisions on labor do not necessarily bring labor protections. There are a number of emerging FTAs in the Pacific Region and the several very significant ones on the cusps of conclusion are discussed below so as to evaluate current approaches of labor protections by FTAs. This paper proposes the “new generation” of FTA social dimension provisions should embrace a marriage of international obligations, which incorporate mandates for private contractual remedies under International Framework agreements (“IFA”), CSRs, and Codes of Conduct, with the private obligations contractually enforceable by private parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信