超边缘策略:丹麦福利国家中的残疾难民

Diversity Gains Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.5771/9783748909705-173

T. Hughes

{"title":"超边缘策略:丹麦福利国家中的残疾难民","authors":"T. Hughes","doi":"10.5771/9783748909705-173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human suffering presents the social sciences with a fundamental dilemma. As social scientists, we often withdraw from suffering or reduce the suffering bodies to the status of hapless victims – or we look for agency and force of individuals who can beat the system they suffer or remake their own experiences of suffering in transcendental form. (Rønsbo/Jensen 2014: 1)","PeriodicalId":106310,"journal":{"name":"Diversity Gains","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypermarginal Strategies: Refugees with Disability in the Danish Welfare State\",\"authors\":\"T. Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748909705-173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human suffering presents the social sciences with a fundamental dilemma. As social scientists, we often withdraw from suffering or reduce the suffering bodies to the status of hapless victims – or we look for agency and force of individuals who can beat the system they suffer or remake their own experiences of suffering in transcendental form. (Rønsbo/Jensen 2014: 1)\",\"PeriodicalId\":106310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diversity Gains\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diversity Gains\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748909705-173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity Gains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748909705-173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

人类的苦难给社会科学带来了一个根本性的困境。作为社会科学家，我们经常从痛苦中退缩，或者将痛苦的身体降低到不幸的受害者的地位，或者我们寻找个体的代理和力量，他们可以击败他们所遭受的系统，或者以超然的形式重塑他们自己的痛苦经历。(Rønsbo/Jensen 2014: 1)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hypermarginal Strategies: Refugees with Disability in the Danish Welfare State

Human suffering presents the social sciences with a fundamental dilemma. As social scientists, we often withdraw from suffering or reduce the suffering bodies to the status of hapless victims – or we look for agency and force of individuals who can beat the system they suffer or remake their own experiences of suffering in transcendental form. (Rønsbo/Jensen 2014: 1)

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Diversity Gains

自引率

0.00%

发文量