回顾2018年第24号政府条例关于电子综合商业服务的法律公正、确定性和法律便利

Raden Mas Try Ananto Djoko Wicaksono
{"title":"回顾2018年第24号政府条例关于电子综合商业服务的法律公正、确定性和法律便利","authors":"Raden Mas Try Ananto Djoko Wicaksono","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.44905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study conducted a legal review of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 as the forerunner to the formation of OSS. Aims to analyze the elements of justice, legal certainty and legal expediency in accordance with the objectives of the formation of law. This research is a normative juridical research with the technique of collecting material from the literature consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that the application and enactment of OSS on the basis of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 concerning Electronically Integrated Business Licensing Services is not in accordance with legal objectives. This is due to the absence of a transition period in the enactment of the regulations and provides an opportunity for the community and / or business actors to learn and adapt to a system that is completely new in the world of business licensing.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing Legal Justice, Certainty, and Legal Expediency in Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 Concerning Electronically Integrated Business Services\",\"authors\":\"Raden Mas Try Ananto Djoko Wicaksono\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.44905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study conducted a legal review of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 as the forerunner to the formation of OSS. Aims to analyze the elements of justice, legal certainty and legal expediency in accordance with the objectives of the formation of law. This research is a normative juridical research with the technique of collecting material from the literature consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that the application and enactment of OSS on the basis of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 concerning Electronically Integrated Business Licensing Services is not in accordance with legal objectives. This is due to the absence of a transition period in the enactment of the regulations and provides an opportunity for the community and / or business actors to learn and adapt to a system that is completely new in the world of business licensing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lex Scientia Law Review\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lex Scientia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.44905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Scientia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.44905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究对2018年第24号政府法规进行了法律审查,该法规是OSS形成的先驱。目的是根据法律形成的目标,分析正义、法律确定性和法律权宜性的要素。本研究是一项规范的法律研究,采用文献资料收集技术,由一手法律资料和第二手法律资料组成。结果表明,基于2018年第24号《关于电子综合经营许可服务的政府法规》的OSS的应用和制定不符合法律目的。这是由于法规制定过程中没有过渡期,并为社区和/或商业参与者提供了学习和适应商业许可领域全新系统的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reviewing Legal Justice, Certainty, and Legal Expediency in Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 Concerning Electronically Integrated Business Services
This study conducted a legal review of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 as the forerunner to the formation of OSS. Aims to analyze the elements of justice, legal certainty and legal expediency in accordance with the objectives of the formation of law. This research is a normative juridical research with the technique of collecting material from the literature consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that the application and enactment of OSS on the basis of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 concerning Electronically Integrated Business Licensing Services is not in accordance with legal objectives. This is due to the absence of a transition period in the enactment of the regulations and provides an opportunity for the community and / or business actors to learn and adapt to a system that is completely new in the world of business licensing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信