基于OpenAirInterface和OpenBTS的GPRS和LTE通信网络性能比较

Yeremia Nikanor Nugroho, Riri Fitri Sari, R. Harwahyu
{"title":"基于OpenAirInterface和OpenBTS的GPRS和LTE通信网络性能比较","authors":"Yeremia Nikanor Nugroho, Riri Fitri Sari, R. Harwahyu","doi":"10.1109/ICIEE49813.2020.9277396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OpenBTS and OpenAirInterface (OAI) are alternatives to building cellular networks on a portable basis using a computer. They can be useful for providing telecommunication access in emergency situations. GPRS and LTE cellular networks can be formed using OpenBTS and OAI with the help of software defined radio (SDR), such as USRP B210. Providing both GPRS and LTE in emergency situation may better serve the telecommunication requirements. This work focuses on comparative performance evaluations of GPRS and LTE. Our evaluation includes throughput, delay, jitter, and percentage of packet loss. OpenBTS yields throughput, delay, jitter and packet loss of 62.34 KBps, 1.03s, 433.47 ms, and 5.20%, respectively. On the other hand, OAI yields 2.17 MBps, 54.44 ms, 12.48 ms, and 3.12%, respectively. The use of OpenBTS do not support current services such as video access and search. The percentage results of LTE quality for browsing were 69.96% and streaming was 83.80%. LTE optimizes the QoS compared to former use of GPRS up to 34.92 times better for throughput, 19.04 times for smaller delays, 34.73 times for smaller jitters, and 1.66 times for lower packet loss.","PeriodicalId":127106,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of GPRS and LTE Telecommunication Network using OpenAirInterface and OpenBTS with USRP\",\"authors\":\"Yeremia Nikanor Nugroho, Riri Fitri Sari, R. Harwahyu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIEE49813.2020.9277396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OpenBTS and OpenAirInterface (OAI) are alternatives to building cellular networks on a portable basis using a computer. They can be useful for providing telecommunication access in emergency situations. GPRS and LTE cellular networks can be formed using OpenBTS and OAI with the help of software defined radio (SDR), such as USRP B210. Providing both GPRS and LTE in emergency situation may better serve the telecommunication requirements. This work focuses on comparative performance evaluations of GPRS and LTE. Our evaluation includes throughput, delay, jitter, and percentage of packet loss. OpenBTS yields throughput, delay, jitter and packet loss of 62.34 KBps, 1.03s, 433.47 ms, and 5.20%, respectively. On the other hand, OAI yields 2.17 MBps, 54.44 ms, 12.48 ms, and 3.12%, respectively. The use of OpenBTS do not support current services such as video access and search. The percentage results of LTE quality for browsing were 69.96% and streaming was 83.80%. LTE optimizes the QoS compared to former use of GPRS up to 34.92 times better for throughput, 19.04 times for smaller delays, 34.73 times for smaller jitters, and 1.66 times for lower packet loss.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEE49813.2020.9277396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEE49813.2020.9277396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

OpenBTS和OpenAirInterface (OAI)是使用计算机在便携式基础上构建蜂窝网络的替代方案。它们可用于在紧急情况下提供电信接入。在USRP B210等软件定义无线电(SDR)的帮助下,使用OpenBTS和OAI可以形成GPRS和LTE蜂窝网络。在紧急情况下同时提供GPRS和LTE可以更好地满足通信需求。本研究的重点是GPRS和LTE的性能比较评估。我们的评估包括吞吐量、延迟、抖动和丢包百分比。OpenBTS的吞吐量、延迟、抖动和丢包率分别为62.34 KBps、1.03s、433.47 ms和5.20%。另一方面,OAI的速率分别为2.17 MBps、54.44 ms、12.48 ms和3.12%。使用OpenBTS不支持当前的服务,如视频访问和搜索。LTE的浏览质量百分比为69.96%,流媒体为83.80%。与以前使用的GPRS相比,LTE优化了QoS,吞吐量提高了34.92倍,延迟减少了19.04倍,抖动减少了34.73倍,丢包减少了1.66倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison of GPRS and LTE Telecommunication Network using OpenAirInterface and OpenBTS with USRP
OpenBTS and OpenAirInterface (OAI) are alternatives to building cellular networks on a portable basis using a computer. They can be useful for providing telecommunication access in emergency situations. GPRS and LTE cellular networks can be formed using OpenBTS and OAI with the help of software defined radio (SDR), such as USRP B210. Providing both GPRS and LTE in emergency situation may better serve the telecommunication requirements. This work focuses on comparative performance evaluations of GPRS and LTE. Our evaluation includes throughput, delay, jitter, and percentage of packet loss. OpenBTS yields throughput, delay, jitter and packet loss of 62.34 KBps, 1.03s, 433.47 ms, and 5.20%, respectively. On the other hand, OAI yields 2.17 MBps, 54.44 ms, 12.48 ms, and 3.12%, respectively. The use of OpenBTS do not support current services such as video access and search. The percentage results of LTE quality for browsing were 69.96% and streaming was 83.80%. LTE optimizes the QoS compared to former use of GPRS up to 34.92 times better for throughput, 19.04 times for smaller delays, 34.73 times for smaller jitters, and 1.66 times for lower packet loss.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信