果糖胺测定在糖尿病诊断和控制中的临床应用的科学依据?

J Windeler, J Köbberling
{"title":"果糖胺测定在糖尿病诊断和控制中的临床应用的科学依据?","authors":"J Windeler,&nbsp;J Köbberling","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fructosamine assay is about to be used for the control of diabetic patients and for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. An analysis of the original literature is presented to answer the question whether the evaluation of the test is methodologically reliable. Altogether 65 studies are evaluated. Thirty of these studies deal with technical aspects of the test (phase 1). A comparison of the distributions of test results for diabetic and non-diabetic patients is presented in 28 studies (phase 2). However, serious shortcomings in methodology and presentation are apparent. \"Significant\" differences and correlation coefficients are the basis for optimistic conclusions. Only 7 studies are identified where fundamental test parameters such as sensitivity and specificity are given, or can be calculated (phase 3). None of them achieves a satisfactory standard of methodology (selection of patients unclear, assessment made not mutually blind). There is no reliable phase-3-study for the metabolic control of diabetes mellitus. It can be concluded that the fructosamine test is not evaluated sufficiently to allow its routine clinical use. In fact, contrary to a widely quoted opinion, the results presented so far do not suggest a reliable test.</p>","PeriodicalId":15649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","volume":"28 3","pages":"129-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fructosamine assay in diagnosis and control of diabetes mellitus scientific evidence for its clinical usefulness?\",\"authors\":\"J Windeler,&nbsp;J Köbberling\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The fructosamine assay is about to be used for the control of diabetic patients and for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. An analysis of the original literature is presented to answer the question whether the evaluation of the test is methodologically reliable. Altogether 65 studies are evaluated. Thirty of these studies deal with technical aspects of the test (phase 1). A comparison of the distributions of test results for diabetic and non-diabetic patients is presented in 28 studies (phase 2). However, serious shortcomings in methodology and presentation are apparent. \\\"Significant\\\" differences and correlation coefficients are the basis for optimistic conclusions. Only 7 studies are identified where fundamental test parameters such as sensitivity and specificity are given, or can be calculated (phase 3). None of them achieves a satisfactory standard of methodology (selection of patients unclear, assessment made not mutually blind). There is no reliable phase-3-study for the metabolic control of diabetes mellitus. It can be concluded that the fructosamine test is not evaluated sufficiently to allow its routine clinical use. In fact, contrary to a widely quoted opinion, the results presented so far do not suggest a reliable test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"129-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

果糖胺测定法有望用于糖尿病患者的控制和糖尿病的诊断。对原始文献的分析是提出回答的问题,评估测试是方法学上可靠的。总共评估了65项研究。其中30项研究涉及测试的技术方面(第一阶段)。28项研究(第二阶段)对糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的测试结果分布进行了比较。然而,在方法和呈现方面存在明显的严重缺陷。“显著”的差异和相关系数是乐观结论的基础。只有7项研究确定了基本的测试参数,如敏感性和特异性,或可以计算(阶段3)。没有一项研究达到令人满意的方法学标准(患者选择不明确,评估不是相互盲法)。目前还没有可靠的糖尿病代谢控制的3期研究。结论:果糖胺试验评价不充分,不能作为常规临床应用。事实上,与广泛引用的观点相反,迄今为止提出的结果并不表明这是一个可靠的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The fructosamine assay in diagnosis and control of diabetes mellitus scientific evidence for its clinical usefulness?

The fructosamine assay is about to be used for the control of diabetic patients and for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. An analysis of the original literature is presented to answer the question whether the evaluation of the test is methodologically reliable. Altogether 65 studies are evaluated. Thirty of these studies deal with technical aspects of the test (phase 1). A comparison of the distributions of test results for diabetic and non-diabetic patients is presented in 28 studies (phase 2). However, serious shortcomings in methodology and presentation are apparent. "Significant" differences and correlation coefficients are the basis for optimistic conclusions. Only 7 studies are identified where fundamental test parameters such as sensitivity and specificity are given, or can be calculated (phase 3). None of them achieves a satisfactory standard of methodology (selection of patients unclear, assessment made not mutually blind). There is no reliable phase-3-study for the metabolic control of diabetes mellitus. It can be concluded that the fructosamine test is not evaluated sufficiently to allow its routine clinical use. In fact, contrary to a widely quoted opinion, the results presented so far do not suggest a reliable test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信