推理器如何简化数据库查询(为什么他们还没有这样做)?

Michael Benedikt
{"title":"推理器如何简化数据库查询(为什么他们还没有这样做)?","authors":"Michael Benedikt","doi":"10.1145/3196959.3196989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last few decades have seen vast progress in computational reasoning. This has included significant developments in theory, increasing maturity of tools both in performance and usability, and the evolution of standards and benchmarks. The purpose of this article is to reflect on the use of reasoning for rewriting and simplifying relational database queries. We undertake a review of some of the results and reasoning algorithms that have been developed with a motivation from query evaluation, and add to this a look at open problems in the area as well as a critique of prior work from the point of view of practice.","PeriodicalId":344370,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 37th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","volume":"107 S118","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can Reasoners Simplify Database Querying (And Why Haven't They Done It Yet)?\",\"authors\":\"Michael Benedikt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3196959.3196989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The last few decades have seen vast progress in computational reasoning. This has included significant developments in theory, increasing maturity of tools both in performance and usability, and the evolution of standards and benchmarks. The purpose of this article is to reflect on the use of reasoning for rewriting and simplifying relational database queries. We undertake a review of some of the results and reasoning algorithms that have been developed with a motivation from query evaluation, and add to this a look at open problems in the area as well as a critique of prior work from the point of view of practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 37th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems\",\"volume\":\"107 S118\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 37th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3196959.3196989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 37th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3196959.3196989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在过去的几十年里,计算推理取得了巨大的进步。这包括理论的重大发展,工具在性能和可用性方面的日益成熟,以及标准和基准的演变。本文的目的是讨论如何使用推理来重写和简化关系数据库查询。我们对一些结果和推理算法进行了回顾,这些结果和推理算法是基于查询评估的动机而开发的,并在此基础上对该领域的开放问题进行了审视,并从实践的角度对先前的工作进行了批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Can Reasoners Simplify Database Querying (And Why Haven't They Done It Yet)?
The last few decades have seen vast progress in computational reasoning. This has included significant developments in theory, increasing maturity of tools both in performance and usability, and the evolution of standards and benchmarks. The purpose of this article is to reflect on the use of reasoning for rewriting and simplifying relational database queries. We undertake a review of some of the results and reasoning algorithms that have been developed with a motivation from query evaluation, and add to this a look at open problems in the area as well as a critique of prior work from the point of view of practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信