垂直斜视或旋转斜视患者垂直和旋转斜视测量的检查

Mami Kubota, A. Kimura, Chiaki Meguro, Chigusa Aihara, Naoko Sano, Maki Tanaka, O. Mimura
{"title":"垂直斜视或旋转斜视患者垂直和旋转斜视测量的检查","authors":"Mami Kubota, A. Kimura, Chiaki Meguro, Chigusa Aihara, Naoko Sano, Maki Tanaka, O. Mimura","doi":"10.4263/JORTHOPTIC.37.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The angles of vertical and cyclo deviations measured by a synoptophore are very important data to decide on the course of treatment. However, we sometimes had the fact that the data by the synoptophore varied according to other measurement methods.So we studied the difference of data between the afferent and centrifugal methods.Subjects: Forty-seven patients with vertical and/or cyclo strabismus, and 23 controls of good visual acuity without strabismus were investigated in this prospective study.Methods: Each subjective angle at their primary position was first measured by the centrifugal method of moving the tube outwards on the synoptophore. Next, the tube of the synoptophore was moved far away from the position corresponding with the centrifugal data and then we measured the subjective angle again by afferent pathway approaching behind far point. We defined the difference in data between two methods as the dissociation.Results: The dissociations of the cyclo deviations were significantly larger than those of vertical deviations between the strabismic subjects and the controls. The vertical dissociations of the strabismic group were significantly larger than those of the control group, especially, those of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) subjects and decompensation superior oblique palsy (decompensate SO palsy) subjects. No significant difference was detected between the strabismic group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggest that the dissociation of data between the afferent and centrifugal methods may be more associated with the stability of eye position than with the ability of binocular fusion. We recommend that careful measurements of vertical and/or cyclo deviations be performed in patients with strabismus, particularly those with TAO and/or decompensate SO palsy.","PeriodicalId":205688,"journal":{"name":"Japanese orthoptic journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of the Measurements of Vertical and Cyclo Deviations in the Patients who have Vertical or Cyclo Strabismus\",\"authors\":\"Mami Kubota, A. Kimura, Chiaki Meguro, Chigusa Aihara, Naoko Sano, Maki Tanaka, O. Mimura\",\"doi\":\"10.4263/JORTHOPTIC.37.91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The angles of vertical and cyclo deviations measured by a synoptophore are very important data to decide on the course of treatment. However, we sometimes had the fact that the data by the synoptophore varied according to other measurement methods.So we studied the difference of data between the afferent and centrifugal methods.Subjects: Forty-seven patients with vertical and/or cyclo strabismus, and 23 controls of good visual acuity without strabismus were investigated in this prospective study.Methods: Each subjective angle at their primary position was first measured by the centrifugal method of moving the tube outwards on the synoptophore. Next, the tube of the synoptophore was moved far away from the position corresponding with the centrifugal data and then we measured the subjective angle again by afferent pathway approaching behind far point. We defined the difference in data between two methods as the dissociation.Results: The dissociations of the cyclo deviations were significantly larger than those of vertical deviations between the strabismic subjects and the controls. The vertical dissociations of the strabismic group were significantly larger than those of the control group, especially, those of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) subjects and decompensation superior oblique palsy (decompensate SO palsy) subjects. No significant difference was detected between the strabismic group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggest that the dissociation of data between the afferent and centrifugal methods may be more associated with the stability of eye position than with the ability of binocular fusion. We recommend that careful measurements of vertical and/or cyclo deviations be performed in patients with strabismus, particularly those with TAO and/or decompensate SO palsy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese orthoptic journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese orthoptic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4263/JORTHOPTIC.37.91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese orthoptic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4263/JORTHOPTIC.37.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:天气仪测量的垂直和旋转偏差角是决定治疗过程的重要数据。然而,我们有时会遇到天气仪的数据随其他测量方法而变化的事实。因此,我们研究了传入法和离心法的数据差异。对象:本前瞻性研究调查了47例垂直和/或环视斜视患者和23例无斜视的良好视力对照。方法:首先用离心法在天气仪上向外移动试管,测量每个主观角的主要位置。然后,将天气仪的管移到离离心数据所对应的位置很远的地方,然后通过靠近远点后的传入路径再次测量主观角度。我们将两种方法之间的数据差异定义为分离。结果:斜视受试者与对照之间的纵横偏差解离性显著大于垂直偏差解离性。斜视组的垂向游离度明显大于对照组,尤其是甲状腺相关性眼病(TAO)和失代偿性上斜肌麻痹(SO)组。斜视组与对照组无显著性差异。结论:传入法和离心法的数据分离与眼位稳定性的关系大于双眼融合的关系。我们建议斜视患者,特别是TAO和/或失代偿性SO麻痹患者,仔细测量垂直和/或旋转偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of the Measurements of Vertical and Cyclo Deviations in the Patients who have Vertical or Cyclo Strabismus
Purpose: The angles of vertical and cyclo deviations measured by a synoptophore are very important data to decide on the course of treatment. However, we sometimes had the fact that the data by the synoptophore varied according to other measurement methods.So we studied the difference of data between the afferent and centrifugal methods.Subjects: Forty-seven patients with vertical and/or cyclo strabismus, and 23 controls of good visual acuity without strabismus were investigated in this prospective study.Methods: Each subjective angle at their primary position was first measured by the centrifugal method of moving the tube outwards on the synoptophore. Next, the tube of the synoptophore was moved far away from the position corresponding with the centrifugal data and then we measured the subjective angle again by afferent pathway approaching behind far point. We defined the difference in data between two methods as the dissociation.Results: The dissociations of the cyclo deviations were significantly larger than those of vertical deviations between the strabismic subjects and the controls. The vertical dissociations of the strabismic group were significantly larger than those of the control group, especially, those of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) subjects and decompensation superior oblique palsy (decompensate SO palsy) subjects. No significant difference was detected between the strabismic group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggest that the dissociation of data between the afferent and centrifugal methods may be more associated with the stability of eye position than with the ability of binocular fusion. We recommend that careful measurements of vertical and/or cyclo deviations be performed in patients with strabismus, particularly those with TAO and/or decompensate SO palsy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信