从洛克的财产论看埃塞俄比亚妇女的不动产权利观念

Kuma Beyene Fita
{"title":"从洛克的财产论看埃塞俄比亚妇女的不动产权利观念","authors":"Kuma Beyene Fita","doi":"10.55529/jls.11.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to John Locke’s theory of property, once the person mixes their labour with a common property then that property, be it movable or immovable, belong to that person and they can use, possess or transfer it to a third party. But things are different in Ethiopia when woman’s right to property:-specifically their rights to immovable property are concerned. According to norms and values prevalent in most parts of Ethiopia, women cannot have rights to immovable property at all. They cannot possess, use or transfer these property by any means even if they contributed or mixes their labour with these different kinds of property. These customary laws are still winning out over legal frameworks in most rural parts of Ethiopia. This is a serious problem and results in unjust system of property.","PeriodicalId":205081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Subjects","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of the Notions of Women’s Immovable Property Rights in Ethiopia in light of John Locke’s Theory of Property\",\"authors\":\"Kuma Beyene Fita\",\"doi\":\"10.55529/jls.11.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to John Locke’s theory of property, once the person mixes their labour with a common property then that property, be it movable or immovable, belong to that person and they can use, possess or transfer it to a third party. But things are different in Ethiopia when woman’s right to property:-specifically their rights to immovable property are concerned. According to norms and values prevalent in most parts of Ethiopia, women cannot have rights to immovable property at all. They cannot possess, use or transfer these property by any means even if they contributed or mixes their labour with these different kinds of property. These customary laws are still winning out over legal frameworks in most rural parts of Ethiopia. This is a serious problem and results in unjust system of property.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Subjects\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Subjects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55529/jls.11.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Subjects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55529/jls.11.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

根据约翰·洛克的财产理论,一旦一个人将自己的劳动与共同财产相结合,那么这个财产,无论是动产还是不动产,都属于那个人他们可以使用,占有或转让给第三方。但是,在埃塞俄比亚,当妇女享有财产权时,情况就不同了——特别是涉及到她们对不动产的权利。根据埃塞俄比亚大部分地区普遍存在的规范和价值观,妇女根本不可能拥有不动产的权利。他们不能以任何方式占有、使用或转让这些财产,即使他们贡献或混合了他们的劳动与这些不同种类的财产。在埃塞俄比亚的大多数农村地区,这些习惯法仍然胜过法律框架。这是一个严重的问题,导致不公正的财产制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment of the Notions of Women’s Immovable Property Rights in Ethiopia in light of John Locke’s Theory of Property
According to John Locke’s theory of property, once the person mixes their labour with a common property then that property, be it movable or immovable, belong to that person and they can use, possess or transfer it to a third party. But things are different in Ethiopia when woman’s right to property:-specifically their rights to immovable property are concerned. According to norms and values prevalent in most parts of Ethiopia, women cannot have rights to immovable property at all. They cannot possess, use or transfer these property by any means even if they contributed or mixes their labour with these different kinds of property. These customary laws are still winning out over legal frameworks in most rural parts of Ethiopia. This is a serious problem and results in unjust system of property.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信