{"title":"评论:乌克兰国内和美国外交事务-关于2021年华盛顿辩论和核不扩散制度","authors":"Andreas Umland","doi":"10.18278/psy.12.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A think-tank debate in the United States that emerged in the sum-mer of 2021 illustrates challenges to Western policy toward Eastern Europe in general, and to U.S. policy toward Ukraine in particular. Stereotypes of a post-Soviet Ukraine characterized by ultra-nation-alism and authoritarianism spread by Russian propaganda resonate not only in leftist but also in other political circles. This commentary responds to two recent contributions by Ted Galen Carpenter calling for an end to U.S. support for Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":357164,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies Yearbook","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary: Ukrainian Domestic and U.S. Foreign Affairs— Regarding a 2021 Washington Debate and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Umland\",\"doi\":\"10.18278/psy.12.1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A think-tank debate in the United States that emerged in the sum-mer of 2021 illustrates challenges to Western policy toward Eastern Europe in general, and to U.S. policy toward Ukraine in particular. Stereotypes of a post-Soviet Ukraine characterized by ultra-nation-alism and authoritarianism spread by Russian propaganda resonate not only in leftist but also in other political circles. This commentary responds to two recent contributions by Ted Galen Carpenter calling for an end to U.S. support for Ukraine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy Studies Yearbook\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy Studies Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18278/psy.12.1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Studies Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18278/psy.12.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Commentary: Ukrainian Domestic and U.S. Foreign Affairs— Regarding a 2021 Washington Debate and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime
A think-tank debate in the United States that emerged in the sum-mer of 2021 illustrates challenges to Western policy toward Eastern Europe in general, and to U.S. policy toward Ukraine in particular. Stereotypes of a post-Soviet Ukraine characterized by ultra-nation-alism and authoritarianism spread by Russian propaganda resonate not only in leftist but also in other political circles. This commentary responds to two recent contributions by Ted Galen Carpenter calling for an end to U.S. support for Ukraine.