2309例经锁骨下静脉植入永久性心脏起搏电极的体会

Z Bĕlobrádek, J Kvasnicka, V Rozsíval, J Sístek, M Tauchman
{"title":"2309例经锁骨下静脉植入永久性心脏起搏电极的体会","authors":"Z Bĕlobrádek,&nbsp;J Kvasnicka,&nbsp;V Rozsíval,&nbsp;J Sístek,&nbsp;M Tauchman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since April 1975 to the end of 1988 permanent cardiac stimulation was employed in 2,309 patients. The stimulating electrode was placed in the right ventricle in 2,258 patients and in the right atrium in 29 patients. Two electrodes were introduced in 22 patients one in the right ventricle and the other in the right atrium. All electrodes were introduced directly through the subclavian vein. No other approach was used. Serious complications appeared in 4 patients (i. e. in 0.17%). Pneumothorax on the side of the introduced electrode occurred in 3 patients. One woman of 80 died in connection with this complication. Another woman, who was overdosed with Pelentan, experienced hemothorax on the side of electrode insertion. After drug discontinuation and thoracic puncture the patient was doing well. In our opinion the subclavian approach for permanent electrode introduction is much more convenient than the introduction via either the cephalic or the jugular vein respectively. The former approach is considerably quicker and less traumatic in use. This method may be used in practically all patients. The repetitive introduction of the electrode through the same subclavian vein is much appreciated in patients in whom a new electrode has to be introduced. This method may be used for right atrium stimulation and for sequential pacing as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":76515,"journal":{"name":"Sbornik vedeckych praci Lekarske fakulty Karlovy univerzity v Hradci Kralove. Supplementum","volume":"33 5","pages":"667-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Experience with implantation of a permanent electrode for cardiac pacing directly through the subclavian vein in 2,309 patients].\",\"authors\":\"Z Bĕlobrádek,&nbsp;J Kvasnicka,&nbsp;V Rozsíval,&nbsp;J Sístek,&nbsp;M Tauchman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since April 1975 to the end of 1988 permanent cardiac stimulation was employed in 2,309 patients. The stimulating electrode was placed in the right ventricle in 2,258 patients and in the right atrium in 29 patients. Two electrodes were introduced in 22 patients one in the right ventricle and the other in the right atrium. All electrodes were introduced directly through the subclavian vein. No other approach was used. Serious complications appeared in 4 patients (i. e. in 0.17%). Pneumothorax on the side of the introduced electrode occurred in 3 patients. One woman of 80 died in connection with this complication. Another woman, who was overdosed with Pelentan, experienced hemothorax on the side of electrode insertion. After drug discontinuation and thoracic puncture the patient was doing well. In our opinion the subclavian approach for permanent electrode introduction is much more convenient than the introduction via either the cephalic or the jugular vein respectively. The former approach is considerably quicker and less traumatic in use. This method may be used in practically all patients. The repetitive introduction of the electrode through the same subclavian vein is much appreciated in patients in whom a new electrode has to be introduced. This method may be used for right atrium stimulation and for sequential pacing as well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sbornik vedeckych praci Lekarske fakulty Karlovy univerzity v Hradci Kralove. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"667-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sbornik vedeckych praci Lekarske fakulty Karlovy univerzity v Hradci Kralove. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sbornik vedeckych praci Lekarske fakulty Karlovy univerzity v Hradci Kralove. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1975年4月至1988年底,2309例患者接受了永久性心脏刺激。2258例患者将刺激电极置于右心室,29例患者将刺激电极置于右心房。在22例患者中引入两个电极,一个在右心室,另一个在右心房。所有电极均直接通过锁骨下静脉引入。没有使用其他方法。出现严重并发症4例(0.17%)。3例患者发生电极侧气胸。一名80岁的妇女死于这种并发症。另一名服用过量的佩伦坦的妇女在电极插入一侧出现了血胸。停药后经胸腔穿刺,患者恢复良好。我们认为锁骨下入路置入永久电极比分别经头静脉或颈静脉置入更方便。前一种方法使用起来要快得多,创伤也小得多。这种方法几乎适用于所有患者。通过同一锁骨下静脉反复引入电极对于必须引入新电极的患者是非常受欢迎的。这种方法可用于右心房刺激和序贯起搏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Experience with implantation of a permanent electrode for cardiac pacing directly through the subclavian vein in 2,309 patients].

Since April 1975 to the end of 1988 permanent cardiac stimulation was employed in 2,309 patients. The stimulating electrode was placed in the right ventricle in 2,258 patients and in the right atrium in 29 patients. Two electrodes were introduced in 22 patients one in the right ventricle and the other in the right atrium. All electrodes were introduced directly through the subclavian vein. No other approach was used. Serious complications appeared in 4 patients (i. e. in 0.17%). Pneumothorax on the side of the introduced electrode occurred in 3 patients. One woman of 80 died in connection with this complication. Another woman, who was overdosed with Pelentan, experienced hemothorax on the side of electrode insertion. After drug discontinuation and thoracic puncture the patient was doing well. In our opinion the subclavian approach for permanent electrode introduction is much more convenient than the introduction via either the cephalic or the jugular vein respectively. The former approach is considerably quicker and less traumatic in use. This method may be used in practically all patients. The repetitive introduction of the electrode through the same subclavian vein is much appreciated in patients in whom a new electrode has to be introduced. This method may be used for right atrium stimulation and for sequential pacing as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信