COMMUNICATIVE ROLE OF A JUDGE: STRATEGIES AND TACTICS OF SPEECH BEHAVIOR IN JUDICIAL DISCOURSE

The article is devoted to the review of scientific concepts of judicial discourse as a kind of legal discourse, analyzes the main communicative roles of a judge in judicial discourse, clarifies the main strategies and tactics of speech behavior characteristic of the communicative role of a judge in judicial discourse. The concept of communicative role is thoroughly characterized by such a scientist as J. Sternin, who divides the communicative role into standard and initiative, and initiative, in turn, is also divided into two groups: short-term (short-term, situational) and long-term (long-term). The main views of modern linguists on the problem of defining judicial discourse are reviewed, in particular, the linguistic aspects of communication in court are thoroughlypresented. The degree of research of the problem in linguistics on studying the problems of legal discourse is analyzed, for example the works of such scientists as N. V. Artykutsa, S. V. Dordy, Yu. F. Pradid, O. L. Dotsenko, O. O. Kobzeva are presented.The focus is on the problem of legal terminology, various aspects of the language of legislation, linguistic issues of legal expertise and features of speech genres of legal discourse.