一种综合不同用户界面评价方法结果的决策方法

Marwa Hentati, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, Selem Charfi
{"title":"一种综合不同用户界面评价方法结果的决策方法","authors":"Marwa Hentati, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, Selem Charfi","doi":"10.1109/ICTA.2013.6815296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of the interactive systems has been the subject of numerous researches during the last two decades. However, it still remains a difficult task to establish. Generally, evaluators exploit a single method to proceed to an interactive system evaluation. However, many authors assert that a single method is not enough to obtain relevant evaluation results. As a solution, we propose a decision-making approach for the synthesis of data collected by different evaluation methods to obtain more reliable evaluation results. The proposed approach is based on three evaluation methods: the questionnaire, the ergonomic quality inspection and the electronic informer. As an evaluation result, the proposed approach provides evaluators with the quantification of the evaluation dimensions: the usability and the system functionality degree.","PeriodicalId":188977,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A decision-making approach for the synthesis of results issued from different user interface evaluation methods\",\"authors\":\"Marwa Hentati, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, Selem Charfi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTA.2013.6815296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation of the interactive systems has been the subject of numerous researches during the last two decades. However, it still remains a difficult task to establish. Generally, evaluators exploit a single method to proceed to an interactive system evaluation. However, many authors assert that a single method is not enough to obtain relevant evaluation results. As a solution, we propose a decision-making approach for the synthesis of data collected by different evaluation methods to obtain more reliable evaluation results. The proposed approach is based on three evaluation methods: the questionnaire, the ergonomic quality inspection and the electronic informer. As an evaluation result, the proposed approach provides evaluators with the quantification of the evaluation dimensions: the usability and the system functionality degree.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTA.2013.6815296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTA.2013.6815296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去的二十年中,对交互系统的评估一直是众多研究的主题。然而,建立这一制度仍然是一项艰巨的任务。通常,评估人员利用单一方法进行交互式系统评估。然而,许多作者认为,单一的方法不足以获得相关的评价结果。为此,我们提出了一种决策方法,将不同评价方法收集的数据进行综合,以获得更可靠的评价结果。该方法基于三种评价方法:问卷调查法、人机工程质量检验法和电子检波器法。作为评估结果,该方法为评估人员提供了量化的评估维度:可用性和系统功能度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A decision-making approach for the synthesis of results issued from different user interface evaluation methods
The evaluation of the interactive systems has been the subject of numerous researches during the last two decades. However, it still remains a difficult task to establish. Generally, evaluators exploit a single method to proceed to an interactive system evaluation. However, many authors assert that a single method is not enough to obtain relevant evaluation results. As a solution, we propose a decision-making approach for the synthesis of data collected by different evaluation methods to obtain more reliable evaluation results. The proposed approach is based on three evaluation methods: the questionnaire, the ergonomic quality inspection and the electronic informer. As an evaluation result, the proposed approach provides evaluators with the quantification of the evaluation dimensions: the usability and the system functionality degree.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信