[事件相关的去同步和用于量化刺激前和刺激后皮层激活的α频带的选择]。

H Schimke, W Klimesch, G Pfurtscheller
{"title":"[事件相关的去同步和用于量化刺激前和刺激后皮层激活的α频带的选择]。","authors":"H Schimke,&nbsp;W Klimesch,&nbsp;G Pfurtscheller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The amount of event-related decrease of increase in alpha-band power is termed \"Event-Related Desynchronization\" or ERD. In this study, ERD is used as an index of cortical activation, which not only can be applied to monitor poststimulus but prestimulus processes as well. Usually, ERD is analyzed within a fixed range of alpha-frequency, typically within a range of 8-12 Hz. alpha-frequency, however, shows a considerable between subject variation, even in a sample of subjects with comparable age. The purpose of this study, thus is to show as to how the range of alpha-frequency affects the calculation of ERD. Two different methodological approaches were compared. First, ERD was calculated within a fixed range of 8-12 Hz. Second, ERD was calculated within an individual range, which was adjusted to the individually determined alpha-frequency of each subject. A sample of ten right handed subjects participated in an episodic memory experiment, in which target words, shown in a earlier session of the experiment, were to be identified. A time span of 375 ms preceding and following the presentation of a word was defined as the \"pre-\" and \"poststimulus\" interval. EEG-signals were recorded unipolarly from 29 leads. The results show a rather localized increase of ERD in the poststimulus interval. In the prestimulus interval on the other hand, the average magnitude of ERD is much lower and the topographical distribution less localized. Most importantly, however, when comparing the two methods of analyzing ERD, those ERD-values calculated within an individually determined alpha-band, are superior in order to differentiate between the pre- and poststimulus interval.</p>","PeriodicalId":75812,"journal":{"name":"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete","volume":"21 4","pages":"219-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Event-related desynchronization and the selection of an alpha-frequency band for quantifying cortical pre- and poststimulus activation].\",\"authors\":\"H Schimke,&nbsp;W Klimesch,&nbsp;G Pfurtscheller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The amount of event-related decrease of increase in alpha-band power is termed \\\"Event-Related Desynchronization\\\" or ERD. In this study, ERD is used as an index of cortical activation, which not only can be applied to monitor poststimulus but prestimulus processes as well. Usually, ERD is analyzed within a fixed range of alpha-frequency, typically within a range of 8-12 Hz. alpha-frequency, however, shows a considerable between subject variation, even in a sample of subjects with comparable age. The purpose of this study, thus is to show as to how the range of alpha-frequency affects the calculation of ERD. Two different methodological approaches were compared. First, ERD was calculated within a fixed range of 8-12 Hz. Second, ERD was calculated within an individual range, which was adjusted to the individually determined alpha-frequency of each subject. A sample of ten right handed subjects participated in an episodic memory experiment, in which target words, shown in a earlier session of the experiment, were to be identified. A time span of 375 ms preceding and following the presentation of a word was defined as the \\\"pre-\\\" and \\\"poststimulus\\\" interval. EEG-signals were recorded unipolarly from 29 leads. The results show a rather localized increase of ERD in the poststimulus interval. In the prestimulus interval on the other hand, the average magnitude of ERD is much lower and the topographical distribution less localized. Most importantly, however, when comparing the two methods of analyzing ERD, those ERD-values calculated within an individually determined alpha-band, are superior in order to differentiate between the pre- and poststimulus interval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"219-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与事件相关的α波段功率的减少或增加的量称为“事件相关的去同步”或ERD。在本研究中,ERD被用作皮质激活的指标,它不仅可以用于监测刺激后的过程,也可以用于监测刺激前的过程。通常,ERD在固定的α频率范围内进行分析,通常在8-12 Hz范围内。然而,alpha频率显示受试者之间存在相当大的差异,即使在年龄相当的受试者样本中也是如此。因此,本研究的目的是表明α频率的范围如何影响ERD的计算。比较了两种不同的研究方法。首先,在8-12 Hz的固定范围内计算ERD。其次,计算个体范围内的ERD,并将其调整为每个受试者单独确定的α频率。10个惯用右手的实验对象参加了一个情景记忆实验,在这个实验中,他们要识别在实验早期出现过的目标单词。单词呈现前后375毫秒的时间间隔被定义为“刺激前”和“刺激后”时间间隔。从29根导联单极记录脑电图信号。结果表明,ERD的增加在刺激后的时间间隔内有一定的局限性。另一方面,在刺激前区间,ERD的平均幅度要小得多,地形分布也不那么局域化。然而,最重要的是,当比较两种分析ERD的方法时,在单独确定的alpha波段内计算的ERD值在区分刺激前和刺激后区间方面是优越的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Event-related desynchronization and the selection of an alpha-frequency band for quantifying cortical pre- and poststimulus activation].

The amount of event-related decrease of increase in alpha-band power is termed "Event-Related Desynchronization" or ERD. In this study, ERD is used as an index of cortical activation, which not only can be applied to monitor poststimulus but prestimulus processes as well. Usually, ERD is analyzed within a fixed range of alpha-frequency, typically within a range of 8-12 Hz. alpha-frequency, however, shows a considerable between subject variation, even in a sample of subjects with comparable age. The purpose of this study, thus is to show as to how the range of alpha-frequency affects the calculation of ERD. Two different methodological approaches were compared. First, ERD was calculated within a fixed range of 8-12 Hz. Second, ERD was calculated within an individual range, which was adjusted to the individually determined alpha-frequency of each subject. A sample of ten right handed subjects participated in an episodic memory experiment, in which target words, shown in a earlier session of the experiment, were to be identified. A time span of 375 ms preceding and following the presentation of a word was defined as the "pre-" and "poststimulus" interval. EEG-signals were recorded unipolarly from 29 leads. The results show a rather localized increase of ERD in the poststimulus interval. In the prestimulus interval on the other hand, the average magnitude of ERD is much lower and the topographical distribution less localized. Most importantly, however, when comparing the two methods of analyzing ERD, those ERD-values calculated within an individually determined alpha-band, are superior in order to differentiate between the pre- and poststimulus interval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信