{"title":"重新思考集体住宅:以Arturo Soria的空间灵活性和适应性为例(马德里,1975)","authors":"Virginia De Jorge Huertas","doi":"10.3390/arts9030074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an analysis of a collective housing project designed by the architects Emilia Bisquert Santiago, Carmen Gonzalez Lobo, Jose Miguel de Prada Poole and Ricardo Aroca in the Arturo Soria neighbourhood in Madrid in 1975. This project is noteworthy for its architects’ preference for designing flexible and adaptable spaces, both in the interior distribution of the homes spaces and in the common spaces of the building itself. Their main aim was to eliminate the rigid spatial segregation that was a dominant feature of Spanish housing estates promoted by the OSH (House Building Union) during the Franco Regime (1939–1975). To understand this idea, this research proposes a comparison between a Housing Estate promoted by the OSH in 1956 and the Arturo Soria building designed in 1975. The article explains and analyses the different architectural strategies that the architects proposed to achieve that flexibility and adaptability: a permanent structural ‘infrastructure,’ an intermediate architectural system adaptable over time, and finally, a range of possible configurations for the individual dwelling. Another important issue is the relationship between the construction system and alternative development of both horizontal and vertical living space. Explaining this relationship could help shape the habitability of future homes, the development of a sense of community, the possibility of designing for tenancies of different lengths and needs and the management of constant changes to a collective society.","PeriodicalId":187290,"journal":{"name":"The Artist and Journal of Home Culture","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Collective Housing: A Case Study of Spatial Flexibility and Adaptability in Arturo Soria (Madrid, 1975)\",\"authors\":\"Virginia De Jorge Huertas\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/arts9030074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents an analysis of a collective housing project designed by the architects Emilia Bisquert Santiago, Carmen Gonzalez Lobo, Jose Miguel de Prada Poole and Ricardo Aroca in the Arturo Soria neighbourhood in Madrid in 1975. This project is noteworthy for its architects’ preference for designing flexible and adaptable spaces, both in the interior distribution of the homes spaces and in the common spaces of the building itself. Their main aim was to eliminate the rigid spatial segregation that was a dominant feature of Spanish housing estates promoted by the OSH (House Building Union) during the Franco Regime (1939–1975). To understand this idea, this research proposes a comparison between a Housing Estate promoted by the OSH in 1956 and the Arturo Soria building designed in 1975. The article explains and analyses the different architectural strategies that the architects proposed to achieve that flexibility and adaptability: a permanent structural ‘infrastructure,’ an intermediate architectural system adaptable over time, and finally, a range of possible configurations for the individual dwelling. Another important issue is the relationship between the construction system and alternative development of both horizontal and vertical living space. Explaining this relationship could help shape the habitability of future homes, the development of a sense of community, the possibility of designing for tenancies of different lengths and needs and the management of constant changes to a collective society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Artist and Journal of Home Culture\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Artist and Journal of Home Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts9030074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Artist and Journal of Home Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts9030074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文分析了1975年由建筑师Emilia Bisquert Santiago、Carmen Gonzalez Lobo、Jose Miguel de Prada Poole和Ricardo Aroca在马德里Arturo Soria社区设计的一个集体住宅项目。这个项目值得注意的是,它的建筑师喜欢设计灵活和适应性强的空间,无论是在家庭空间的内部分布还是在建筑本身的公共空间。他们的主要目的是消除严格的空间隔离,这是佛朗哥政权(1939-1975)期间由OSH(房屋建筑联盟)推动的西班牙住宅区的主要特征。为了理解这个想法,本研究提出了1956年由OSH推广的住宅小区与1975年设计的Arturo Soria建筑之间的比较。这篇文章解释和分析了建筑师提出的不同的建筑策略,以实现灵活性和适应性:一个永久性的结构“基础设施”,一个随着时间的推移而适应的中间建筑系统,最后是一个单独住宅的一系列可能的配置。另一个重要的问题是建筑系统与水平和垂直生活空间的替代发展之间的关系。解释这种关系可以帮助塑造未来住宅的可居住性,社区意识的发展,为不同长度和需求的租约设计的可能性,以及对集体社会不断变化的管理。
Rethinking Collective Housing: A Case Study of Spatial Flexibility and Adaptability in Arturo Soria (Madrid, 1975)
This article presents an analysis of a collective housing project designed by the architects Emilia Bisquert Santiago, Carmen Gonzalez Lobo, Jose Miguel de Prada Poole and Ricardo Aroca in the Arturo Soria neighbourhood in Madrid in 1975. This project is noteworthy for its architects’ preference for designing flexible and adaptable spaces, both in the interior distribution of the homes spaces and in the common spaces of the building itself. Their main aim was to eliminate the rigid spatial segregation that was a dominant feature of Spanish housing estates promoted by the OSH (House Building Union) during the Franco Regime (1939–1975). To understand this idea, this research proposes a comparison between a Housing Estate promoted by the OSH in 1956 and the Arturo Soria building designed in 1975. The article explains and analyses the different architectural strategies that the architects proposed to achieve that flexibility and adaptability: a permanent structural ‘infrastructure,’ an intermediate architectural system adaptable over time, and finally, a range of possible configurations for the individual dwelling. Another important issue is the relationship between the construction system and alternative development of both horizontal and vertical living space. Explaining this relationship could help shape the habitability of future homes, the development of a sense of community, the possibility of designing for tenancies of different lengths and needs and the management of constant changes to a collective society.